My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2011 4:54:04 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/10/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines Initial Study <br /> Development due to buildout under the Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines would be <br /> subject to the Construction General Permit, the Alameda Countywide Municipal Stormwater National <br /> Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, Industrial General Permit, Waste Discharge <br /> Requirements for the Livermore - Amador Valley Water Management Agency, Dublin -San Ramon <br /> Services District, City of Pleasanton, Livermore- Amador Valley Water Management Agency Export and <br /> Storage Facilities Intermittent Peak Wet Weather Discharge to the San Lorenzo Creek, Alamo Canal, or <br /> Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit, Order No. R2- 2006 -0026, NPDES Permit No. CA0037813), <br /> Master Water Recycling Permit, and potentially an individual Waste Discharge Requirement for <br /> construction dewatering, if substantial groundwater was encountered during construction, or an <br /> individual Waste Discharge Requirement if there would be discharges of water to the land surface, other <br /> than recycled water covered under the blaster Water Recycling Permit. <br /> Consequently, several regulatory mechanisms would ensure that the potential for violation of a Waste <br /> Discharge Requirement would not be substantial within the areas to be rezoned. Furthermore, the <br /> existing regulations are considered protective of water quality standards. The potential for discharges of <br /> polluted stormwater from construction to affect beneficial uses of groundwater recharge, fish migration <br /> and spawning, wildlife habitat, water contact and non - contact water recreation, and cold and warm <br /> freshwater habitat for nearby waterways would not be substantial. Implementation of existing <br /> regulatory requirements for the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit would ensure <br /> that any violation of Waste Discharge Requirements or water quality standards during any construction <br /> in Pleasanton would be less than significant. <br /> Further, residential and retail /service land uses due to implementation of the proposed standards and <br /> guidelines would not be expected to result in any adverse water quality effects that would be significant. <br /> The project sites are located within the 500 -year flood zone and could be impacted by some flooding, <br /> although such flooding would not he considered potentially significant. <br /> The project sites are not at any greater hazard for flood inundation due to a levee or dam failure than <br /> any other site within Pleasanton. The project sites, like most of Pleasanton, are within the Del Valle <br /> Dam Flood inundation area. <br /> No impact. Development of housing consistent with the Hacienda TOD Standards and Design <br /> Guidelines would not violate any water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, or otherwise <br /> degrade water quality. Furthermore, the proposed project would not involve any groundwater <br /> extraction or augmentation. There is no risk of seiche, tsunami, or mudflow at the project sites because <br /> the site is inland. <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant with Less Than No <br /> Significant Significant Impact <br /> Mitigation <br /> Impact Impact <br /> Incorporation <br /> 10. Land Use and Planning — Would the project: <br /> a) Physically divide an established community? X <br /> h) Conflict with any applicable land uxe plan, policy, or X <br /> regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br /> project (including, but not united to the general plan, <br /> specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br /> ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br /> mitigating an environmental effect? <br /> Draft, Subject to Revision 23 2/11/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.