My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2011 4:54:04 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/10/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines Initial Study <br /> c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation X <br /> plan or natural community conservation plan? <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> The three project sites are located within Hacienda, a developed business park with some residential <br /> land uses, designated on the General Plan land use map as Mixed Use /Business Park. Currently all <br /> three sites are vacant with ruderal (weedy) vegetation. <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> The impact questions above constitute the significance criteria for this environmental topic. <br /> Discussion of Checklist Items <br /> No Impact. Development according to the proposed Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines <br /> would be infill development in an established business and residential park thus it would not disrupt or <br /> divide an established community. The development would implement the PUD -MU mixed use zoning <br /> and would be consistent with the land use designation and policies in the General Plan. No habitat <br /> conservation plan is applicable in this developed area. <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant with Less Than No <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant Impact <br /> Impact Incorporation Impact <br /> 11. Mineral Resources — would the project: <br /> a) Result in the loss Of availability of a known mineral X <br /> resource that would be of value to the region and the <br /> residents of the state? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability Of locally- important <br /> mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general X <br /> plan, specific plan or other land use p an? <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> No mineral resources that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state are known to <br /> occur in the project vicinity. <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> The impact questions above constitute the significance criteria for this environmental topic. <br /> Discussion of Checklist Items <br /> No Impact. The project sites are not within the mapped mineral resources zone. Several gravel quarries <br /> that are designated Aggregate Resource Areas in the City's General Plan are located on El Charm Road <br /> more than 2 miles east of the project sites. The project would not result in the Toss of those mineral <br /> resource areas. <br /> Draft, Subject to Revision 24 2/11/ NH I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.