My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082510
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 082510
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:26:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/25/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Pavan stated that the City does not require all the parking lot to be stubbed out but <br />only those spaces closest to the office building. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired whether parking row should have one stub so as to feed <br />spots in that row. He indicated that he felt there is an opportunity to build in the <br />infrastructure at construction time, which would cost a lot less than doing it after the <br />fact. <br />Mr. Pavan indicated that there is a condition of approval requiring a stub out, conduit, <br />and pull strings in those spaces closest to the office buildings only. He added that the <br />applicant needs to do the installation. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that the last time this project came before the Commission, <br />it was around 58,000 square feet with a possible expansion of 5,000 to 7,000 square <br />feet. He inquired if this was no longer the case. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that Safeway reduced the area to 58,000 square feet because the <br />company feels that size can accomplish its business plan for this store. He noted that <br />should it expand to 65,000 square feet in the future, the applicant would need to submit <br />the plan to the Planning Division to ensure sufficient parking space accommodations. <br />Commissioner Pentin inquired where the storm water runoff is in the park property and <br />inquired if the ponds were those by Valley Avenue. He further inquired if these were <br />new ponds. <br />Mr. Pavan confirmed that these are the ponds by Valley Avenue but that there are no <br />new structures or facilities to handle storm water runoff. He indicated that the applicant <br />will need to provide bio swales and pipes and ensure water is retained long enough to <br />achieve its settling function. <br />Commissioner Pentin referred to the two new crosswalks that lead to the Bernal <br />Corporate Park and one on the corner of Valley Avenue and Bernal Avenue. He <br />inquired if there were any restrictions or stipulations against Fairgrounds parking. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that this would be up to Safeway Stores and that there are no <br />conditions in the PUD addressing Fairgrounds parking. <br />Commissioner Pentin noted that according to the parking requirements for the entire <br />facility, it is over-parked by 200 spaces, especially in the retail portion of the complex. <br />He inquired if the impact of that corner has been brought into the traffic study, <br />considering the Good Guys and Fairground activities. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that the traffic study did not analyze Fairgrounds parking. He <br />indicated that there is a condition that states that the applicant can request the City <br />Council to have the Vehicle Code enforced on this property. He noted that he has seen <br />signs referring to towing vehicles that are not supposed to be parked in certain areas.’ <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 25, 2010 Page 26 of 38 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.