My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
bench swing, and maybe a small tot area. He staled that they definitely should be an <br /> amenity. <br /> Chair Narum suggested 1:hat the project be conditionec that when 50 percent of the <br /> homes are sold, a homeowners meeting be held to vote for or against a tot lot, with the <br /> developer devoting a certaii dollar amount. <br /> Commissioner Pentin inquired if the Commission could include such a condition. <br /> Commissioner Blank inquired if the project would have a homeowners association <br /> (HOA) or a maintenance association. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that the project was originally proposed to have a maintenance <br /> association because there was no common open area; however, if the open space <br /> parcel becomes common a-ea, there will most likely be an HOA. He noted that there <br /> have been some exceptions where the City has implemented maintenance associations <br /> for open space areas. <br /> Julie Harryman stated that these types of questions have arisen in the past, and what <br /> staff routinely hears from developers is that the cost of setting up an HOA and <br /> implementing it on a small project like this does not make sense. She added that staff <br /> has also been leaning towards maintenance associaticns and maintenance agreements <br /> for projects of this size. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that if he were moving into a home, he would want to be <br /> represented by an HOA because they are independent of the City and can take legal <br /> actions, whereas a maintenance association cannot. <br /> Ms. Harryman concurred and added that they both have their pro's and con's. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired whether or not an open space parcel would belong to <br /> the City under a maintenance association. <br /> Ms. Harryman said no. She explained that the open space can be owned in a variety of <br /> different ways. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired whether the City could include play equipment if the <br /> project were a maintenance association. <br /> Ms. Harryman said yes. She added that the City could also include other things like <br /> utilities, shared driveways, and storm water requirements. She noted there would be <br /> CC&Rs for the development, and :hose would set forth maintenance responsibilities. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor in:wired if the City could have the developer fund the <br /> maintenance area with iterr s not initially installed for the project. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 13 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.