My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Harryman said yes. <br /> 7. Is the proposed parking adequate? Should an additional quest parking space be <br /> added to the open space parcel? <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that if the number of home decreases, parking will <br /> improve. She indicated that she is not in favor of adding more parking to the open <br /> space parcel and did not believe parking was adequate for the 13 units. <br /> Commissioners unanimously concurred. <br /> Chair Narum noted that if the developer chooses the option for 13 units and decreases <br /> the square footage of homes, there will be additional room for parking. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that if the FARs are decreased equivalent to the size of one <br /> lot, that much more space would be available to address parking. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he did not support adding more parking spaces in <br /> the open space areas. <br /> Commissioner Pentin stated that an entire lot opening up should create a design factor <br /> that allows for more open space and more parking if needed. <br /> The Commissioners agreed. <br /> 8. Does the Commission support the proposed tree removal and mitigation? <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he would like to retain as many trees as possible and <br /> did not support the current plan to remove trees or their mitigation. He noted that <br /> reducing the FARs or removing a unit would provide the ability to keep more trees. He <br /> indicated, however, that if the density were reduced, he possibly could support a new <br /> tree removal and mitigation plan. <br /> Commissioner Pearce agreed and did not support the tree report and mitigation. She <br /> indicated that she was also strongly in favor of saving at least two of the three Deodar <br /> cedar trees as they represent the character of the area and are in good shape. She <br /> requested to have Mike Fulford, City Landscape Architect, to come and talk to the <br /> Commission about this. <br /> Commissioner Pentin stated that he would like to see all of the trees stay but suggested <br /> a reworking of the map. He agreed that at some point, the development must be <br /> realistically feasible; otherwise, the developer may do nothing, which would not serve <br /> the entire purpose. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor likened the situation of a consultant providing an opinion on <br /> the historic home as with the trees and felt that most of them were worth saving. He <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 14 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.