My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
noted that if space can be created through the elimination of at least one or two units, a <br /> better design might allow saving the more marginal trees slated for removal. <br /> Chair Narum agreed and supported the priority to save the healthier heritage trees, <br /> given a re-design. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that developers are asked to replace a tree being removed <br /> with another, or contribute toward the cost of it in another location. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that staff does not believe there is adequate room to do <br /> that on this lot, but this may be possible with the reduction of a unit or two. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that it the Commission wants the development to move <br /> forward, the DTSP envisiors sometimes removing a tree that is in good shape as long <br /> as there is a good trade-off He added that this does not mean removing every tree but <br /> noted there are exceptions that can be made. <br /> 9. Does the Commission wish to make any suggestions regarding the house type, <br /> sizes, height, setbacks s_Fes or design? <br /> Commissioner Pentin noted that FARs and density have been discussed, and given the <br /> house's removal, he supposed the previously approved design. He added, however, <br /> that if the house were saved, then the architecture was not right. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor voiced support as well, but indicated that he would also <br /> support a plan for attached homes. <br /> Chair Narum stated that her only comment is that there are two homes with rear yard <br /> setbacks of seven feet along the railroad tracks. She indicated that she would like <br /> these increased to ten feet to be consistent with those on the east side. <br /> The Commissioners agreed. <br /> 10. If the location of the open space parcel remains as is currently proposed, should <br /> the location and species of the new trees and tall-growing shrubs planted in the <br /> open space parcel be selected to prevent shading impacts on the neighbor's <br /> PV panels? <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that this would be difficult to discuss without the new design. <br /> 11. Should the applicant Luther modify the project to reduce shading impacts on the <br /> neighbor's PV panels? <br /> Commissioner Pentin stated that he would hope the neighbor's shading issues are <br /> addressed by the developer when the plan is returned; however, he noted that in order <br /> for open space to be useable in the summertime, some trees are needed. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 15 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.