Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner O'Connor requested that staff clarify that_tern. <br /> Ms. Decker stated that encroachments into setback areas do net include media centers. She <br /> indicated that the Code allowed for bay windows and fireplaces to encroach, which were <br /> generally found in sideyard setback areas. She noted that the tear yard area did not meet the <br /> current standards and that the media center could not be considered an allowable encroachment. <br /> The setback was per the staff report, which was three feet. <br /> Commissioner Fox noted that the applicant indicated there was a difference in height between <br /> 39.5 feet per staff and 29.7 feet per the applicant. She inquired whether there was a difference in <br /> the way the applicant measured :he height. Ms. Soo noted that the height was measured based <br /> upon the distance from the lowest point to the peak of the building. <br /> Mr. DiDonato noted that the drawings were scaleable and that the height was up to 27 feet. <br /> Chair Blank noted that should be clarified. <br /> Ms. Decker noted that as the plans are developed more fully, staff will confirm what the <br /> dimension is and whether it would be based on the midpoint or the ridge. She added that staff <br /> will return with the appropriate information. <br /> Commissioner Fox noted that the landscaping plan did not appear to show landscaping in the <br /> back or the side yards and asked if that was accurate. She inquired whether there would be <br /> landscaping or if it would be finz.tized when the houses were bought. <br /> Mr. Camp replied that they showed landscaped entry courtyards and streetscapes, front yards by <br /> the builder, and side yards to the side yard fencing. He added that they would develop typical <br /> techniques for buyers to landscape their own side and rear yards, which would be offered as an <br /> option if the buyer decided to do that. <br /> Commissioner Fox noted that since there was no guest parking and assuming that it would he <br /> striped red, she inquired what: the service vehicles would do if there were no parking allowed. <br /> Mr. Paulza noted that four parking stalls would be provided on Stanley Boulevard and that the <br /> homes would faced the interior -oad rather than Stanley Boulevard. Commissioner Fox inquired <br /> whether Comcast would have to park on Stanley Boulevard if it had to service the house on Lot <br /> 9. Mr. Paulza noted that they would be able to drive in and coordinate parking with the owners. <br /> Commissioner Fox inquired whether trucks would have to use the driveways since no guest <br /> parking was allowed. Mr. Paulza replied that depending on the kind of trucks, they maybe able <br /> to come in, but they would generally park on Stanley Boulevard. <br /> In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regarding whether the paving on the drive <br /> would be standard asphalt, Mr. 'aulza replied that the program was to have textured paving at <br /> the front of the project. He added that as drivers continued through the private access drive, they <br /> would show an AC paved area, and the driveway aprons would be textured, colored, and scored <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 21, 2008 Page 5 of 17 <br />