My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 16 - <br /> V. Evaluation of the Noise Exposures and Vibration Levels <br /> A. <br /> Exterior Noise Exposures <br /> To evaluate the on-site noise exposures against the City of Pleasanton Noise <br /> Element standards. the DNL.'s for the sun e3 lacations were calculated by decibel <br /> averaging of :he Lei's as they apps to the daily suhperiods of the DNL index. A <br /> nighttime weighting laeuir vVas applied to account for the increased human sensitivity to <br /> noise at night. Adjustments were trade to the measured noise levels to account for the <br /> difference in distance Netween the measurement locations and the various building <br /> setbacks. using methods established by the Highway Research Board. Ref (e). and Wyie <br /> Laboratories. Ref. (f). The DM_ formula is shown in Appendix B. The results of the <br /> calculations are shown in Appendix C. <br /> The calculations show that the existing noise exposure at measurement Location I <br /> 45 ft. from the centerline of Stanley Boulevard ranged were from 63. 64 and 65 dB DNL <br /> on days 1. 2 and 3. respectively. However. these noise exposures are a combination of <br /> both Stanley Boulevard traffic noise and rail noise. To segregate the two sources_ the <br /> information contained in Tables I. II and III watt extrapolated to Location 1 then <br /> subtracted from the total sound levels. the railroad noise exposures at Location I were <br /> 57. 59 and 60 dB DNL. The results of these caret lotions yielded noise exaosures of 62 <br /> dB DNL for each of the ihree measurement days from Stanley Boulevard traffic. Under <br /> future traffic conditions. the noise exposure from Stanle} Boulevard traffic -.s expected to <br /> increase to 65 dB DM... At the property lines if Lots 1 and 14 closest to Stanley <br /> Boulevard. the noise exposures are 63 and 66 dB DNL under existing and future traffic <br /> conditions. respectiyely. Thus. tae noise exposures will he up to 6 dB in excess of the <br /> City of Pleasanton Noise element in the most noise impacted rear and side yards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.