My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
022112
>
11 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 12:18:04 PM
Creation date
2/14/2012 1:43:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/10/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F__ ... EXHIBIT <br /> Y <br /> ---.--' THE CITY OF <br /> � " _ II s Z NJIN., ADMINISTRATOR <br /> O lit" STAFF REPORT <br /> P <br /> LE ASANTON0 r _ October 19, 1998 — -- - , <br /> 4,00 pm <br /> SUB.IECI. Z-98-211 <br /> APPLICANTS AND 'Todd and Linda Deike <br /> PROPERTY OWNERS: <br /> PURPOSE: An application to construct a 6-foot I I-inch tall wood good neighbor fence . <br /> along the northern(side)property line and a 7-foot 3-inch tall fence along <br /> • the western(rear)property line. <br /> _ <br /> ZONING: R-1-6,500 <br /> LOCATION: 3642 Carlsbad Way <br /> , <br /> ATTACHMENTS: I. Exhibit A -- Site Plan, Applicant's Statem, at <br /> 2. Exhibit 13 -- Draft Conditions of Approval <br /> 3. Location Map <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> Todd Deike submitted an application for administrative design review to construct an • • <br /> overheight fence along his side and tear prnr..;,., line. Because the adjacent neighbors I <br /> had indicated to Mr. Deike that they were. - •.., poruve of the fence design or height,the- - I ' <br /> ,_ neighbors did not sign the appl.-t '-• ,.,, • co'•applicants. Mr, Deike indicated to <br /> staff at the time he applied that the}. pus, . . 1 would be located completely on his property rather than on the property line as a shared property-line fence as is more typical. - <br /> Therefore. the adjacent property-owners were not required to sign the application as ! <br /> co-applicants. When notices of the application were dent to neighbors,the two neighbors - — - <br /> to the side and rear of the Deikes expressed concerns with the fence and staff arranged it-_-- ,. ,, __„i. <br /> Zoning Administrator hearing to reach a solution. <br /> • _._3 3 <br /> -- <br /> 4 <br /> -- Cat.No. Z-98.211 - ZaningA�do ti.sn'atoot <br /> - �: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.