11 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

• - r. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the west side of Carlsbad Way and is an interior lot on 1% this cul-de-sac street. The lot shares common side property lines with 3656 Carlsbad Way to the north and 3628 CafIsbad Way to the south, and it rear property line with 3633 - -Glacier Court to the rear(west), The Deike property is at a slightly lower elevnticnthan - --- the lot to the rear. \ 'the applicants desire to install two acw fencer;along the side and rear property lines. The two new fences would he located within their property lines and therefore would not be considered shared property line fences. The applicants are proposing to bear the entire cost of each new knee since the knees would he entirely on their property. The . tic: applicants feel that the existing fencing along these two property lines is in disrepair and in need of replacement. Additionally, the applicants have a pool in their rear yard and , _ want to ensure maximum privacy and safety with fencing which is taller than is currently __ _ . IV f, in place. The applicants note that they have had some privacy issues with the neighbor at 3619 Glacier Court North(please refer to the location map)and desire a higher fence along the rear property line. i • a% The fence to the side is estimated to be about 20 years old and is only obeys-f a feet in height. Ideally,the Deikes would want to replace this lower fence with 6 'ence constructed to good neighbor standards complete with kicker board,lappe vertical fencehoards, routed top and "picture frame" on all sides (see applicant's statement). The -. c1l' ence would be taller than any other fencing which that neighbor has on her property - -and the fence design would be different than all of the current fencing. Since the neighbor, Ms. pink,did not agree to a replacement fence,the Deikes are requesting . approval of a new fence on their property only; Ms. Fink's existing fence would remain. The fence to the rear also is not constructed to the more typical good neighbor fence standard; all of the fence Raining and support is located on the Deikes'side of the fence with the smooth fenceboard facing the Pretzels. The fence tends to sag in places and I • • - - - varies in height(on the Pretzels'side) from about 5'6"to 6'tall generally due to the aging -- - fence construction and natural grad�anges. Again, ideally, the Deikes would want to '-- — t replace this existing fence with�T fence(as measured from their side)built to the _-__ i , ' same standards as indicated above, The proposed fence would be taller than any other = fencing which Mr. Pretzel has on his property and the fence design would be different ._ -. • than all of the current fencing. Because Mr. Pretzel's rear property line extends about 16 feet beyond the property line shared with the Deikes,a portion of Mr. Pretzel's rear Il property line fence would be at a different height and be of a different style than the remainder, Since Mr, Pretzel did not agree to a replacement fence,the Deikes are -- v { Care Na 7-98-211 Zoning Administrator I. _ __ Page t „ . . • • n .