My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
061813
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2013 4:41:14 PM
Creation date
6/13/2013 11:22:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/18/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLEASANTON <br /> CHAMBERI May 22,2013 <br /> COMMERCE <br /> Planning Commissioners,City of Pleasanton <br /> c/o Janice Stern,Planning Manager <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> 200 Old Bernal Avenue <br /> Pleasanton. CA 94566 <br /> RE: Planning Commission Agenda Item 6a. East Pleasanton Specific Plan <br /> Dear Planning Commission Members: <br /> On behalf of the Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce I appreciate the opportunity to provide <br /> feedback/recommendations regarding the progress to-date on the East Pleasanton Specific Plan(EPSP) <br /> alternatives you are considering at this time. <br /> There are compelling reasons to allocate more workforce housing for the east side. <br /> a) The prior work of the City's Housing Task Force demonstrated the many challenges associated <br /> with identifying and rezoning parcels for high density residential throughout the City where <br /> infrastructure limitations and compatibility with neighboring uses generates significant obstacles <br /> and/or resistance. <br /> b) While Alternative 3 goes the farthest toward meeting current RHNA obligations,no alternative <br /> conies close to meeting reasonable estimates for both current and future RHNA.obligations,and <br /> this is terribly short-sighted given the opportunities on the east side. <br /> c) It is imperative the City not find itself facing costly new litigation by the State of California,or <br /> find itself in a position where local control is lost to the courts or the State of California for <br /> failing to meet our RHNA obligations. <br /> d) Given the availability of approximately one million square feet of vacant light industrial property <br /> in Livermore at roughly 50-60 percent of the cost of like property in Pleasanton,we question the <br /> reasoning behind the inclusion of so much industrial zoning for East Pleasanton. There is <br /> substantial property available elsewhere in Pleasanton to accommodate future light industrial or <br /> precision manufacturing uses as both the need and opportunity arise. <br /> e) The extension of El Charro Road to Stanley Boulevard is important to improving traffic <br /> circulation in all of North and East Pleasanton,and it is imperative the East Pleasanton Specific <br /> Plan support its fair share of infrastructure costs which will require zoning to accommodate <br /> higher value, feasible,quality development. <br /> f) Lowering the amount of industrial property will make it significantly easier to gradually increase <br /> densities away from existing neighborhoods. <br /> g) We encourage more "affordable by design"such as small lot detached homes at 8-10 DUA to <br /> provide more entry level housing. <br /> Thank you for your consideration. <br /> Best Regards, f _l <br /> t Raty <br /> President/CEO <br /> www.plcasanton.org <br /> 777 Peters Avenue • Pleasanton. ( A 94566 • Phone: (925) K.0-585$ • Fax: (9_25) S16-9697 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.