My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
061813
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2013 4:41:14 PM
Creation date
6/13/2013 11:22:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/18/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: heather Truro <br /> To: lanirp Stera <br /> Subject: East side plan for Pleasanton <br /> Date: Wednesday,May 22,2013 8:16:33 PM <br /> I would appreciate you entering my comments into the official record and circulating <br /> them with the task force and decision makers. I was planning on being at the <br /> meeting tonight but have an unexpected family situation that prevents me from <br /> attending. <br /> I am deeply disturbed by the 4 alternatives that are being presented. None of these <br /> plans remotely reflect the direction given by the community at the initial meetings to <br /> gain public opinion. Each time the public comments the plans move forward in a <br /> different direction. <br /> Of the 4 proposed plan alternatives - none reflect the interest expressed by the <br /> public. It appears clear that alternatives are being put forward that are contrary to <br /> direction even given by task force members - to keep the mix similar to the rest <br /> of Pleasanton relative to high density housing/ single family housing ratios. <br /> I am very concerned that we are creating more problems for Pleasanton with very <br /> little to gain. Is the intent here to create a dumping ground for low income <br /> housing? No one wants it in their neighborhood so lets create a new part of town <br /> to put all the low income housing?! Are you kidding me! This is not in the spirit of <br /> the law of blending. This is not in the spirit of the community and this does not <br /> match with any of our "Community of Character" characteristics. <br /> I would like to have these options pulled from consideration before more time and <br /> money is wasted on something that is so clearly objectionable. <br /> If one of these plans had to go through, the only one even with in the realm of <br /> reasonableness is alternative one that has the least amount of high density housing <br /> ( a ratio of high density housing more similar to the rest of Pleasanton. <br /> Lets not throw away our "jewel" and make it into the bad part of town. Lets not <br /> squander the last bit of open space we have. Lets not add traffic and over impact <br /> the most traffic laden & high impacted schools in Pleasanton. <br /> Thank you for taking my comments into consideration, <br /> Heather Truro <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.