23 - Laserfiche WebLink

the housing units are in high density buildings and presumed to be rentals. This creates a transient community and one lust the opposite of the rest of the city (where rent;rls are just one auarter of all housing units)_ This can potentially negatively impact schools, city service needs, and property values in one area of the city vs. spreading high density rentals across the city. This reduces burden on any one area and helps integrate our new residents. G Recommend high density units/rentals (vs. single family units) be no more than 40-50% of the total housing units planned • The previous council said they wanted "balance" across the city in terms of meeting RHNA higher density needs. Options 2 and 3 create imbalance by putting such a large share on the East side. Recommend the east side not be assigned more than 35%(worst case 50% or 500 units)of the future RHNA low/moderate income needs (note: options 1 and 4 are 50% today and come closest to balance) O In addition, it seems prudent to develop a 20-30 year vision of where else we may want to see these units (infill, BART, etc.) so we create balance across the city vs. putting so much burden in this one area just because it is vacant. To just put the units here because it seems "easy" is not forward thinking. • I also encourage us to also look at the degree to which we might be able to have some of the units be targeted at seniors if this is legal and possible. This would minimize impact on schools, traffic, etc. Thank you Nancy Allen Click here to report this email as spam.