23 - Laserfiche WebLink

From: 1188a alien To: Mina Hoev; lanire Stera Cc: Brian Dolan:"nanev alien" Subject: Back-up and quick reference sheet to my e-mail of yesterday Date: Wednesday,May 22,2013 1:08:14 PM Attachments: FPSP RHNA worksheet vs.alternatives 052213 xis Hi, Attached is a quick reference spreadsheet I used to look at the question of RHNA balance across the city and community type (mix for single family vs. higher density buildings) referenced in my e-mail from yesterday. I compared data from the latest census bureau data to the 4 options proposed using data provided by Janice and Brian. I got a couple question on this so wanted to pass along. I also made minor updates to my memo to you with no changes to bottom line recommendation (edits are below in blue). Bottom line is to recommend Option 1 (and option 4 as a back-up). As you look at the data arrayed this way, you can see that: • Options 2 and 3 put over 50% of low/mod RHNA allocation on the East side • Options 2 and 3 create an East Pleasanton neighborhood where 67-72% of families live in high density buildings vs. single family homes (the opposite of Pleasanton and the statewide average) • In contrast: o Option 1 comes closest to creating a more balanced distribution o Option 2 comes second to the closest in creating a more balanced distribution Nancy Allen www.montereybayseaglass.com From: nancy alien [mailto:ncallen @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:43 PM To: 'mhoey @cityofpleasantonca.gov'; Janice Stern (jstern @ci.pleasanton.ca.us) Cc: 'ncallen @comcast.net' Subject: Input for Planning Meeting on 1/22/13 HI Maria and Janice, Would appreciate if you could please copy Planning Commissioners and include in any materials. Thank you. Hello, There are 4 principles I think are important in evaluating alternatives for East Pleasanton A) Create a healthy community that maintains/enhances the quality of life in Pleasanton —does not burden neighboring areas B) Do this in a way that this neighborhood is similar to other Pleasanton neighborhoods in terms of ownership vs. rentals and a healthy mix of densities vs. creating area that is predominantly high density and renters vs. owner C) Insure future lower cost/moderate RHNA needs are met through balance across the city or overweight near BART where there are easy transportation access and major job hubs. Do not use EPSP as default for majority of high density just because it is vacant today. D) Insure option we select is financially feasible and supports infrastructure, incl,lding extending El Charro to Stanley Option 1 (and 4 as a backup) is the only option that comes close to meeting the above criteria. I have serious concerns with other options. • 2 of the options do meet criteria A, B, and C as they create a community where nearly 3/4ths of