04 - Laserfiche WebLink

IV. ANALYSIS The proposed amendment to the third amendment to the Phase I and Phase II Development Agreements are attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively. Exhibit C is the original Phase I Development Agreement between the City of Pleasanton and Callahan-Pentz Properties, dated December 30, 1983, and Exhibit D is the original Phase II Development Agreement between the City of Pleasanton and the Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated April 22, 1986. The third amendment is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2013. The extension would extend the expiration date of the previous amendment to December 31, 2018 consistent with the term on the BRE properties. The terms, conditions, and understandings of the previous Development Agreements for these sites when they received their PUD Design Review approvals would remain in full force and effect. New projects in Hacienda would pay City and regional traffic impact fees as required by City Traffic Engineer. Each new project will be evaluated for its anticipated water use and corresponding increase in the required sewer capacity. The Planning Commission has previously requested an edited copy of development agreements, ordinances, etc., to show the additions and deletions. Since the proposal only changes the expiration date from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2018, staff has not provided an edited copy of the previous development agreement. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The traffic resulting from these sites in Hacienda was addressed in the Final EIR for the City's 2005-2025 General Plan, and again in the Housing Element Supplemental EIR, confirming the conclusions of the original analysis. On January 4, 2012, the City Council certified a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report SEIR) and adopted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Housing Element update and Climate Action Plan General Plan Amendments and Rezonings. This SEIR was a supplement to the EIR prepared for the Pleasanton 2005-2025 General Plan which was certified in July 2009. These eight sites were considered and assumed to be completed in these CEQA documents, and, therefore, these previous CEQA analyses adequately evaluate the potential impacts of this extension. VI. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice was mailed to all property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the eight sites covered by this application and to all property owners within Hacienda Phase I and Phase II. Exhibit E is a copy of the noticing area. Staff has not received any verbal or written communications from the noticed property owners as of the writing of the staff report. Any public comments or concerns will be forwarded to the Planning Commission. Page 5