My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT C <br /> P13-2078. Summerhill Apartment Communities <br /> Work Session to review and receive comments on a Preliminary Review <br /> application to demolish the existing office building and construct 177 apartment <br /> units and related site improvements on a 5.9-acre site located at 5850 West Las <br /> Positas Boulevard in Hacienda Business Park. Zoning for the property is <br /> PUD-MU (Planned Unit Development— Mixed Use) District. <br /> Jenny Soo presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements <br /> of the proposal. She noted that staff has received emails from Chamberlin Associates, <br /> the adjacent property owner to the west, expressing concern about the first exception <br /> requested to locate the carports eight feet rather than 50 feet from the western property <br /> line; and from the commercial tenants of the property expressing concern about <br /> residents throwing trash onto the commercial site during move-out time, and overflow <br /> parking in the sense that even if the project meets the parking requirements, there could <br /> be extra vehicles for each unit. She added that the commercial tenants questioned how <br /> management would handle both concerns and proposed that a fencing and landscaping <br /> barrier be installed to separate the development from the adjacent commercial property. <br /> Ms. Soo stated that staff also received a considerable number of email and phone calls <br /> from the neighbors on the south side, the Parkside community, expressing concerns <br /> about density and its link to crime; low-income housing and the income level of the <br /> tenants; construction hours and the management of the construction; noise, dust, and <br /> traffic; impact on existing services and schools; and impact on the environment and <br /> wildlife. She added that some proposed that the project be moved closer to the BART <br /> station and that the residential project be replaced with commercial buildings as the City <br /> is losing commercial building stock. <br /> Ms. Soo stated that the developer held an Open House meeting on Wednesday, <br /> September 4th, which a few neighbors attended, including four couples from the <br /> Parkside neighborhood and two residents from another development. She noted that <br /> no specific questions, concerns, or objections were raised and that most of the inquiries <br /> were about the building height, density, construction time, the type of project and the <br /> need for it, and schools. <br /> Commissioner Olson asked where the four-story buildings would be located. <br /> Ms. Soo displayed that site plan, pointing to the sections colored the darkest as the <br /> four-story buildings. <br /> Commissioner Olson inquired if the buildings across the open space are also four <br /> stories. <br /> Ms. Soo said yes. She indicated that Sheet A1.2 of Exhibit B includes a color chart that <br /> shows the number of stories of the different buildings. <br /> Commissioner Olson inquired if there were any four-story buildings along the Arroyo. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 11, 2013 Page 1 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.