My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to be entirely for low-income, as these are primarily and predominantly for market-rate <br /> and very high-end units, with a portion for affordable housing. He noted that this is true <br /> for all the housing projects that have been brought into the Park recently. He stated that <br /> he recognizes the concerns about this issue but also wants to make sure there is a full <br /> discussion about what types of units are being built and what they are going to be able <br /> to accommodate. <br /> Kevin Ebrahimi stated that to clarify some of the things that have come up and following <br /> Mr. Paxson's statements, this apartment community is a Type A community, which is a <br /> very h igh-end community design. He noted that everything is going to be market-rate <br /> with monthly rents anticipated to be anywhere from $2,000 to $3,000, depending on the <br /> type of unit. He added that the people who will be living in this residence will not be <br /> low-income. <br /> With regard to another point that was talked about, Mr. Ebrahimi stated that there will be <br /> a continuous line of six to eight feet tall shrubs all the way along the property line, with <br /> an additional planting of evergreen trees along the same location. He pointed out that <br /> the trees that will be planted there will be 14 to 16 feet tall at maximum height at their <br /> five-year growth, and once fully mature, will grow up to 35 feet tall. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi stated that all the buildings at the back will be two story to three story. He <br /> noted that the pamphlet that was distributed stated that one of the buildings could be a <br /> four story, and that would be a tower element on the community building; however, that <br /> tower element will be a three-story, so nothing will be over three-story in that area. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi stated that there is a map on the Hacienda Business Park website that <br /> shows the community, and he pulled out one that said a little bit about the height of the <br /> buildings along the Arroyo. He noted that that there is a varying height of commercial <br /> buildings in the area, some in the same range as the proposed buildings at 22 feet to <br /> 26 feet tall, and others that are much taller. He pointed out that that the building right <br /> next the project to the left on West Las Positas Boulevard, the Arroyo Center, is up to <br /> 40 feet in height, which is also the height seen in the back and backing up to the arroyo; <br /> the two buildings to the west of the project site, Simpson Manufacturing, are also up to <br /> 40 feet tall, and an existing commercial building across the street, Hacienda West, is up <br /> to 50 feet tall. <br /> Commissioner Olson inquired what the distance is from the back of the existing building <br /> on the site to the edge of the Arroyo, and what the distance will be with the new <br /> building, and if it will be reduced, by how much. <br /> Ms. Stern stated that staff looked into that and indicated that the current building is <br /> 60 feet back from the rear property line, and the closest proposed building would be <br /> between 54 and 55 feet, approximately five feet closer to the rear property line. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked what the height of the three-story building on the backside <br /> would be, compared to a thirty-five foot tall tree. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 11, 2013 Page 14 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.