My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ebrahimi replied that it would be approximately 38 feet high at three stories. He <br /> added that the two-story component would be 24 feet high. <br /> Commissioner Ritter inquired if the buildings along the Arroyo Mocho would have <br /> balconies that face out on the Arroyo or back towards the poolside. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi replied that they have not gotten to the actual design component and that. <br /> they have not even designed that building yet. <br /> Commissioner Ritter suggested that might be something to consider when they get <br /> there. <br /> Commissioner Posson noted that they have talked a lot about the design standards for <br /> the external portions of the building and inquired how they would approach the inside for <br /> the tenants as it relates to energy efficiency and energy self-sufficiency for the project. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi replied that they have an internal task force that looks at what features can <br /> be incorporated into each community they build. He indicated that the task force starts <br /> its work once a site layout is designated. He added that hopefully, with the comments <br /> that they have receive from the Commission tonight, they will know the site plan that is <br /> going to work for this site, after which they will engage with that task force. He indicated <br /> that they can come back to the Commission with all the recommendations of the things <br /> they can provide for this community. <br /> Commissioner Posson inquired if they have a sense of a kind of general philosophy as <br /> to how they approach energy efficiency. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi replied that as a rule for when it comes to the Build it Green requirements, <br /> they try to far exceed the requirements of the jurisdiction they are in. He noted that they <br /> are typically over 100 points and that a lot of jurisdictions they have worked in are about <br /> 50 to 75 points, with the highest being at 80 points. He indicated that they have gone <br /> over the maximum required in almost all the communities they have done, and the <br /> individual aspects of it really depend on the design of the project that they wind up with. <br /> He added that based on that, they look to see which features they can incorporate into <br /> the community. He indicated that they are really excited to look at that and will bring <br /> that before the Commission at their next hearing. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Chair Pearce reminded the public that this is a Work Session and that no decision <br /> would be made. She then advised that the Commission would now go through the <br /> Work Session Discussion Points. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 11, 2013 Page 15 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.