Laserfiche WebLink
required eight-foot setback. He stated that his sense is that this is a limitation due to the <br /> geometry and the layout. <br /> Commissioner Posson stated that he did not see any explanation on why the eight-foot <br /> setback was not feasible. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that parallel parking is being added. <br /> Ms. Soo confirmed that this is for the parallel parking provided on the entry street. <br /> Commissioner Posson inquired what the effect would be if the parallel parking is not <br /> provided. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor replied that the parking requirements would not be met. <br /> Ms. Stern said yes. She added that the idea is to create a street coming into the <br /> project, and the parallel parkin.g helps to do that. <br /> Commissioner Posson inquired if there were no other alternatives to meet the parking <br /> requirements. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that in that location, there were no other alternatives than to eliminate <br /> the on-street parking. <br /> Commissioner Posson inquired if staff is supportive of that exemption. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that staff considers it to be pretty minor. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he thinks going from an eight-foot planter to an <br /> almost six-foot planter is fine. <br /> Commissioner Posson stated that, with staff's explanation, he is fine with it. <br /> 6. Is the revised landscaping in the rear acceptable? <br /> Commissioner O'Connor said yes. <br /> Chair Olson also said yes. <br /> Commissioner Posson noted that Mr. Bowen talked about the acoustic properties of <br /> masonry walls. He stated that he knows sound and that noise is a large issue for the <br /> Parkside residents. He indicated that he would like to see some evaluation of the <br /> attenuation properties of the wall in the design and whether there is not a better design <br /> to better abate the noise. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 22, 2014 Page 12 of 16 <br />