My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor stated that he does not have a problem taking a look at it. He <br /> noted that this was another added item Summerhill agreed to put in for the Commission, <br /> so he is glad that they are already doing that. He noted that he does not know how <br /> many more iterations are needed and that it looks like there's always something else <br /> each time around. He ad ded, however, that he does not have a problem looking at it <br /> especially if it is a design. He stated that he heard one gentleman refer to it as a <br /> straight flat wall. He noted that he has seen curved walls, but he does not know if it is <br /> done for noise. <br /> Commissioner Posson stated that he definitely likes the landscape design. He indicated <br /> that he appreciated how the applicant looked at that visual impact and tried to mitigate it <br /> to the greatest extent possible. <br /> Chair Olson inquired if all of the landscaping proposed is on the inside of that sound <br /> wall so the closest thing to the Arroyo is the sound wall. <br /> Mr. Dolan said yes, plus the vines that staff asked for. <br /> Chair Olson stated that he is fine with what is being proposed. <br /> Chair Olson noted that at the last Work Session, he raised the issue of access to the <br /> Arroyo. He stated that he thinks there is no access here and hopes that would remain. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that the access has been eliminated. <br /> Chair Olson noted that there is nothing the Commission can do about the other side of <br /> the Arroyo as that is not the responsibility of this project. He then asked the <br /> Commissioners if they have any other questions. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he has one last comment. He indicated that he is a <br /> bit disappointed that there are no carports on the one side. He stated that he <br /> understands the reasoning behind it and asked if this is all a done deal. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that it is a question staff did not ask the Commission. He indicated <br /> that the applicant would like to put the carports in, but the neighboring properties' <br /> interests oppose them. He added that it would be an additional exception from the <br /> Design Guidelines. He noted that the parking requirement can be met either way; it is <br /> just whether or not the people who live here get the benefit of a carport. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired, assuming there are no carports on that side, how <br /> many parking spaces on the complex would be uncovered. He further inquired if there <br /> would be more than just those on the west side. <br /> Ms. Soo displayed the site plan and pointed out the carports located on the west and <br /> south sides of the project site, the surface parking by Building C, and the parallel <br /> parking on the south side of Building A and B and along the entry street. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 22, 2014 Page 13 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.