My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Olson asked if the first Work Session was also noticed. <br /> Ms. Soo said yes. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that he would also like to share with the Commission, which was <br /> alluded to a little bit, that City Manager Nelson Fialho and he actually hosted and invited <br /> the neighborhood to come to a meeting held in the Council Chamber, and that was a <br /> couple-hour dialogue. He continued that it was followed up with the neighbors agreeing <br /> to sending a small group, which resulted in yet another meeting with him, and they have <br /> been working through some of their issues and continue to do so. He noted that there <br /> may be some legal things, for example, the issue about the dogs, and the City Attorney <br /> is questioning whether that can be done. <br /> Julie Harryman stated that she has not researched that matter, but hearing it tonight, <br /> she is not entirely sure that is something the Commission is interested in. She indicated <br /> that she can certainly research whether or not it is even feasible to put a condition on <br /> the project that would not allow them to have dogs. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he does not know how many people have dogs in <br /> apartments versus houses. He added that obviously, they would have to be inside a <br /> unit and walked by owners, so they are not going to be left unattended in a back yard <br /> where they would be barking all day when no one is home; and if they are barking <br /> inside, they will only disturb other tenants who will then complain to management. He <br /> indicated that he does not really have a problem with dogs. <br /> Chair Olson stated that he is on that side as well. <br /> Commissioner Posson stated that that is where he is too. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that with respect to carports, he is torn because he <br /> understands the next-door neighbors and their view and what they are looking at, but he <br /> also would really like to have seen the apartment complex have the carport as opposed <br /> to open parking because it makes it a more desirable complex. He added that he <br /> certainly know what it is like to leave a car outside and get dust all over it all the time. <br /> He noted that there have been other variances that the Commission has granted and <br /> have had no objections to, and this is the only one which seems to have an objection. <br /> Chair Olson questioned if that item is still under discussion with that property owner. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that the other property owner spoke tonight. <br /> Commissioner Posson stated that he is of the same opinion and understand both points <br /> of view. He indicated that from the tenants' standpoint and from the developer's <br /> standpoint, it is more attractive to have carports, but he understands the adjacent <br /> property owner's concerns as well. He added that he would hope both parties would <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 22, 2014 Page 15 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.