My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor noted that there were not too many and estimated that there <br /> are maybe 30 in the complex. <br /> Ms. Soo replied that was about right. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that it is a significant number. He inquired if all the <br /> surface parking shown on the slide is all guest parking. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that not all of them are for guests. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if they are all assigned parking and noted that there <br /> have to be some guest parking there. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that one space is usually assigned per unit and the rest would be sort <br /> of free for all. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor asked Mr. Dolan if he was looking for any additional input from <br /> the Commissioners. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that it would be helpful if the Commission had an opinion about the <br /> carports. He added that staff got kind of a mixed message on the story pole discussion. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he would rather not spend the money on the story <br /> poles. He indicated that to begin with, a two-story and three-story complex has to be <br /> built. He added that he just wanted to see if there was anything else that could be done <br /> about the roof massing. <br /> Chair Olson stated that he was satisfied with the explanation the applicant gave about <br /> the four buildings and that he does not see any reason for adding to the cost by doing <br /> story poles. <br /> Commissioner Posson stated that he does not see it as a requirement and that he was <br /> only suggesting that as something the applicant may want to consider to give the <br /> residents a better sense of what the visual impact would be or would not be. He <br /> indicated that he would really leave that up to the developer in the discussions with the <br /> residents. He then addressed the methodology used to have discussions with the <br /> residents. He noted that the applicant had said that they reached out to people who <br /> had expressed an interest in the development. He indicated that to him, that is different <br /> from going out and sending a notice out to the neighborhood and asking them to come <br /> down and give their views about an apartment complex they are planning to construct. <br /> Chair Olson asked staff if the Work Session was noticed to everyone. <br /> Ms. Soo said yes. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 22, 2014 Page 14 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.