My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. The City, with assistance of the developer, will coordinate the marketing and selling of the <br /> ten affordable units and the Developer will contribute $15,000 offset the cost of this <br /> process. <br /> • In addition to providing the ten affordable units, the developer will pay a the City's Lower <br /> Income Housing Fee (LIHF) for 44 units (46% of the 94 units) in the amount of $2,783 per <br /> unit for a total fee of$122,452. The per unit fee amount is subject to periodic cost of living <br /> adjustments that would apply at the time the fee is paid. <br /> • In lieu of providing the ten affordable units and paying the fee above, the Developer would <br /> pay an in lieu fee in the amount of$1,235,000 if directed to do so by the City Council. <br /> When reviewing the developer's overall plan, staffs perspective was that it is critical to include <br /> some affordability in the project rather than requiring a payment of the LIHF. Further, staff felt <br /> that it was important that the affordable homes be affordable to households at 80% AMI (low <br /> income) rather than higher income levels such as 100% or 120% AMI (moderate income) <br /> which has been used in some previous developments. As such, as it relates to ownership units <br /> for this development and in general, staff is of the opinion that it is better to acquire deeper <br /> affordability rather than a larger number of price controlled units with a higher selling price. <br /> This is especially critical since recent evidence from other communities indicates that the <br /> closer affordable ownership home pricing gets to market prices, the more difficulty there is with <br /> resales and overall unit management. Therefore, staff determined that having ten units at 80% <br /> AMI was more beneficial than 14 units (15% of the total development) affordable to a <br /> significantly higher income bracket. <br /> To offset this reduction (10-units rather than 14-units), and in addition to providing the ten <br /> affordable units, the developer is agreeing to pay a LIHF of $122,452. It should be noted that <br /> the IZO and LIHF ordinance require a 15% affordability requirement for multi-family <br /> developments and as such, by providing the ten affordable units, it is meeting 71% of its <br /> affordable housing requirement. Based on this requirement, the developer could fill that "gap" <br /> by paying a LIHF for 27 units (29% of the total units) which would result in a fee payment of <br /> $76,069. However, the developer offered and staff accepted that for this particular project, it <br /> would pay a LIHF fee based on the 20% affordable requirement set forth in the IZO for single <br /> family ownership homes. As such, the developer is paying a higher total fee amount. The <br /> following formula was applied for determining the fee: <br /> • 94 units X 20% = 19 units <br /> • 10 affordable units provided = 53% of the required 19 units <br /> • 47% unmet affordable need = 44 units (94 units X 47%) <br /> . 44 units X LIHF of$2,783 = $122,452 <br /> Page - 4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.