My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
have private open space areas in the form of patios or balconies. The private open <br /> space areas range from 53 to 114 sq. ft. in area. <br /> Overall, staff finds the project amenities and group and private open space to be <br /> acceptable. <br /> o Traffic and Circulation <br /> A traffic study for the prior 177-unit apartment development was prepared by Whitlock & <br /> Weinberger Transportation, Inc. (W-Trans). The prior apartment project would have <br /> generated an average of 1,177 new vehicle trips on a daily basis, including 90 additional <br /> trips during the a.m. peak hour and 110 additional trips during the p.m. peak hour. As <br /> the project site is located across from Thomas Hart Middle School, the traffic study <br /> included analysis of school-related traffic. The study stated that 65 of the anticipated <br /> morning trips would be school-related trips and none of the anticipated evening trips <br /> would be school-related. The traffic analysis analyzed traffic at seven intersections <br /> within the vicinity of the project site. The analysis found that all of the study <br /> intersections would operate acceptably under all traffic scenarios with and without the <br /> addition of the project-generated traffic. The study for the prior apartment project <br /> concluded that project would have a less-than-significant impact to the existing traffic. <br /> The prior apartment project was conditioned to provide the design and installation of all <br /> needed modifications to the traffic signal system at the intersection of West Las Positas <br /> Boulevard at Hacienda Drive. A copy of the study is attached as Exhibit B. <br /> The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the current proposal and determined that no <br /> additional traffic analysis would be required as the current project would have 83 fewer <br /> units than the prior apartment project and, therefore, would generate fewer trips than <br /> the prior project. As required for the prior project, the current proposal will be required <br /> to provide the design and installation of all traffic signal modifications. In addition, the <br /> project has been conditioned to pay the applicable City and Tri-Valley Regional traffic <br /> impact fees to help fund future improvements to local and regional roadways. <br /> o Transit <br /> Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) currently provides bus service (the <br /> Wheels Bus System) to the project area. The project design includes a network of <br /> pathways internal to the project that allows access to the sidewalk that leads to the bus <br /> stop. <br /> o Bicycle Storage <br /> The Standards and Guidelines for the proposed project require 0.8 secured and <br /> weather protected bicycle spaces per dwelling unit (94 units x 0.8 = 75 spaces <br /> required). The project summary indicates that bicycle parking would be located in the <br /> garages. The applicant indicated that bicycle hooks would be installed on the garage <br /> wall. Staff has included a condition requiring the bicycle parking areas be clearly <br /> indicated on the garage floor plan. <br /> Summerhill Housing Group Planning Commission <br /> Page 14 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.