My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Short-term construction noise would be generated during construction. The SEIR <br /> included construction related noise mitigation measures (e.g., limiting construction <br /> hours, compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance, locating stationary construction <br /> equipment as far from occupied buildings as possible, etc.). Conditions of approval <br /> have been included to address these mitigation measures. <br /> o Grading and Drainage <br /> The majority of the lot is relatively level with a perimeter landscaped berm along West <br /> Las Positas Boulevard. The applicant is proposing to generally maintain the existing <br /> grades on the property. Parking lot and roof drainage would drain into bio-retention <br /> areas on the project site that would filter contaminants before entering the arroyos. It is <br /> estimated that approximately 8,000 cubic yards of dirt would be excavated on the site. <br /> As conditioned, staff finds the proposed grading and drainage plan to be acceptable and <br /> in compliance with applicable stormwater runoff requirements. The haul route will be <br /> subject to the approval of the City Engineer. <br /> o Architecture and Design <br /> Staff believes that the proposed buildings are generally well designed and articulated. <br /> The building designs feature articulation and detailing on all sides. Portions of the <br /> building walls would be projected or recessed to provide variation in the wall plane and <br /> break up the building. The rooflines of the buildings are broken up to reduce the <br /> building mass and add interest. Building walls vary in materials and colors to provide <br /> variety and interest. The awnings and wrought iron detailing enrich the quality of the <br /> architecture. <br /> Similar to the prior 177-unit development, architectural elements, such as rafter tails, <br /> simulated stone trim, sconces, wrought iron railings, wooden gates, etc. were <br /> incorporated into the building design. In addition, a lowered wall at the first floor patio <br /> area and painted accents and thin brick veneer help break the mass of the buildings <br /> and enhance the buildings' aesthetic appearance. Staff generally finds the buildings are <br /> well-designed. Staff is recommending that the applicant make a few minor revisions <br /> and/or provide additional detailing to address the following items: <br /> • use a different material/color at building base and/or the building base should <br /> project slightly out from the building wall; <br /> • add trellises above the garage doors; <br /> • enhance the entry to each residential unit to be more prominent. <br /> Conditions of approval have been included to address these items. <br /> The proposed building colors would provide additional contrast and variation. Staff finds <br /> the proposed colors and materials, the window design and treatment, and the overall <br /> massing and detailing of all the proposed buildings to be acceptable. <br /> o Green Building <br /> As required by the City's Green Building Ordinance, the proposed project is required to <br /> qualify for at least 50 points on Alameda County Waste Management Authority's <br /> Summerhill Housing Group Planning Commission <br /> Page 16 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.