My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and, ultimately, the bay. The site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault <br /> Zone. <br /> As indicated by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) map', the project site is <br /> not located within a 100-year flood zone, but Arroyo Mocho, which borders the site to the <br /> west, is located within a 100-year flood zone. However, the waters are contained in the <br /> creek's channel and would not be expected to affect the project site. <br /> Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> 5. Whether streets and buildings have been designed and located to complement the <br /> natural terrain and landscape. <br /> The project site is in a developed area of the City and would not involve the extension of <br /> any new public streets. The relatively flat, urban infill site has no constraints to either roads <br /> or buildings. Development of the site complements the natural terrain by making only <br /> minor changes as necessary to the site's existing relatively flat topography. The proposed <br /> buildings will be compatible in size and scale with surrounding structures. <br /> Therefore, staff believes that this PUD finding can be made. <br /> 6. Whether adequate public safety measures have been incorporated into the design of <br /> the plan. <br /> The public improvements associated with this project would be consistent with City design <br /> standards. The driveway entrances are located and configured to provide adequate line-of- <br /> sight viewing distance and to facilitate efficient ingress/egress to and from the project site. <br /> All on-site drive aisles would meet City standards for emergency vehicle access and turn- <br /> around. Adequate access would be provided to all structures for police, fire, and other <br /> emergency vehicles. Buildings would be required to meet the requirements of the Uniform <br /> Building Code, Fire Code, other applicable City codes, and State of California energy and <br /> accessibility requirements. The buildings would be equipped with automatic fire <br /> suppression systems (sprinklers). <br /> Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> 7. Whether the plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District. <br /> The proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD district. One of <br /> these purposes is to ensure that the desires of the developer and the community are <br /> understood and approved prior to commencement of construction. Staff believes that the <br /> proposed project implements the purposes of the PUD ordinance in this case by providing <br /> a high-density residential project that is well-designed and well-integrated with the existing <br /> office development on adjoining properties, that fulfills the desires of the applicant, and that <br /> meets the City's General Plan goals and policies. Moreover, input from the adjacent <br /> Flood Insurance Rate Map 06001C0317G <br /> Summerhill Housing Group Planning Commission <br /> Page 23 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.