My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property owners has been sought and obtained through neighborhood outreach effort by <br /> the applicant; further opportunity for public comment will occur at the Planning Commission <br /> and City Council hearings. <br /> Staff believes that through the PUD process the proposed project has provided the <br /> developer and the City with a development plan that optimizes the use of this infill site in a <br /> sensitive manner. <br /> Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> VI. PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Public notices were sent to property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. Doug <br /> Giffin, Chamberlin Associates, owner of the property located to the immediate west, requested <br /> that the storage units on Buildings 1, 4, 5, and 16 be relocated so that they would not face his <br /> property. The storage units have been relocated. <br /> Staff will forward to the Commission any public comments as they are received. <br /> VII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> On January 4, 2012, the City Council certified a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report <br /> (SEIR) and adopted the CEQA Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the <br /> Housing Element update and Climate Action Plan General Plan Amendment and Rezonings. <br /> This SEIR was a supplement to the EIR prepared for the Pleasanton 2005-2025 General Plan <br /> which was certified in July 2009. The subject property was one of 21 potential housing sites <br /> analyzed in the SEIR. A total of 177 multi-family housing units was analyzed in the SEIR for <br /> this site. <br /> Under CEQA, once an EIR has been prepared for a project, the lead agency (in this case, the <br /> City) may not require a subsequent or supplemental FIR unless: <br /> o Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major revisions of the <br /> EIR; <br /> • Substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project is <br /> being undertaken that will require major revisions in the EIR; or <br /> • New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the <br /> EIR was certified as complete, becomes available. <br /> The CEQA Guidelines further clarify the circumstances under which a supplemental or <br /> subsequent EIR may be required. Guidelines Section 15162 provides as follows: <br /> (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no <br /> subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on <br /> the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the <br /> following: <br /> Summerhill Housing Group Planning Commission <br /> Page 24 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.