Laserfiche WebLink
Maria Hoe <br /> ®Subject: Lund Ranch II <br /> From: Bill and Carolyn Lincoln <br /> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 11:44 AM <br /> To: Maria Hoey <br /> Subject: Lund Ranch II <br /> Good morning, Commissioners. <br /> The never-ending Lund Ranch II saga continues for all--the Commissioners, the developer, the neighborhoods, the <br /> citizens of Pleasanton, and of course our environment. We hope that the vote you make next Wednesday evening will <br /> close this chapter and move your recommendation forward for city council action. <br /> The purpose of this email is to highlight and summarize our perceptions of arguments, discussions, and project analysis <br /> from meetings held on Lund Ranch II over the past several years. <br /> ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF USING SUNSET CREEK LANE FOR ACCESS TO THE LUND RANCH II PROJECT; <br /> I. The existence of a memo of understanding signed 25 years ago by Shapell Homes and an ad hoc group of 5 or 6 <br /> Ventana Hills neighbors for Shapell to use their"best efforts"to route Lund Ranch access through roads other than Lund <br /> Ranch Road. <br /> 2. Prevents more traffic from utilizing current roads used to access Lund Ranch. <br /> ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF USING LUND RANCH ROAD FOR ACCESS TO THE LUND RANCH II PROJECT: <br /> 1. Lund Ranch Road has been used continuously for over 70 years as access to the ranch property. Shapell Homes no <br /> longer exists, and has no interest or commitment to the Lund Ranch II project by Greenbrier Homes. The memo was <br /> signed many years ago by a small group of neighbors, not an elected committee or HOA representing their whole <br /> neighborhood. The memo is non-binding and not a contract that is enforceable in court. <br /> 2. Greenbrier Homes, the developer, strongly prefers use of Lund Ranch Road for project access. <br /> 3. Infrastructure is already in place at the end of the paved portion of Lund Ranch Road for simpler extension to the 50 <br /> home project. From Sunset Creek Lane, it would require an additional distance of 200 to 300 yards of grading and <br /> construction to reach the project. <br /> 4. The neutral and objective EIR strongly recommends the use of Lund Ranch Road over other alternatives for project <br /> access. <br /> 5. There will be far less impact to the environment(ie tree removal, grading, creek reconstruction, etc) using Lund Ranch <br /> Road. <br /> 6. Lund Ranch Road and other current roads utilized for access to the ranch are 8 feet wider than Sunset Creek Lane, <br /> allowing for <br /> easier and safer two-way vehicle trips, while still permitting parking on both sides of the roads. Sunset Creek Lane would <br /> need parking removed to be equally safe for two-way traffic. <br /> 7. Lund Ranch Rd has access to 2 main collector roads (Sunol Blvd and Bernal Ave); Sunset Creek Lane, only one <br /> Sunol Blvd). <br /> W. There are already 4 traffic-calming stop signs between Lund Ranch Rd and Sunol Blvd, and only 2 (both roundabouts) <br /> between Sunset Creek Lane and Sunol Blvd. The roundabout at Sunset& Hanifen is dangerous due to its downhill <br /> 1 <br />