My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:38:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A <br /> approach, and reduced visibility if cars are parked adjacent to the roundabout. We suggest that the Commissioners drive <br /> it from several directions to see for yourselves. <br /> 9. Additional traffic-calming devices (ie speed bumps, etc) offered over the years by the city are available but have <br /> always been rejected by the Lund RanchRdNentana Hills neighborhoods. <br /> 10. The Sycamore Creek Way/Sycamore Road juncture already has inherited the Callippe Golf Course traffic (300-400 <br /> trips per day) <br /> and most of the Happy Valley traffic getting to and from Sunol Blvd. <br /> 11.Due to 680 traffic backup, on many midweek mornings it is next to impossible to turn south onto Sunol Blvd from <br /> Sycamore Road. Sometimes one must wait through 3 or 4 signal changes to get on without illegally blocking the <br /> intersection. <br /> 12. An extension of Sunset Creek Lane as access into the Lund Ranch II project will require traversing slopes over 25 <br /> degrees, many cubic yards of hillside grading, the addition of retaining walls, and generally far greater damage to our <br /> environment. <br /> 13. Pleasanton voter-passed Measure PP trumps all other agreements, city plans, and development objectives and must <br /> be supported by all, especially our elected and appointed officials. Looking for loopholes and making exceptions <br /> compromises and violates the intent of the measure, and would establish a serious and damaging precedent that could be <br /> followed in the future. <br /> We have faith that you will use good judgment and do the right thing, Commissioners. Your important and potentially <br /> precedent-setting vote is critical for the future of all Pleasanton residents and can help to insure that the ridges and <br /> hillsides that make our city special will be preserved for generations to come. For the reasons listed above, please send <br /> the city council a unanimous vote for the continued use of Lund Ranch Rd for access into Lund Ranch. Thank you for <br /> considering our thoughts in this email. <br /> Bill and Carolyn Lincoln <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.