My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:38:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
protection initiative, not a hillside expansion initiative," and so Commissioners should take a <br /> "conservative view" when interpreting PP. That is consistent with the first words of the <br /> Measure: "Ridgelines and hillsides shall be protected." And it is further supported by the <br /> citation, in the ballot materials, of "a mile long road spanning the top of many of our <br /> Southeast Hills" and the "Happy Valley by-pass road" as the sort of developments that PP <br /> would bar. This tips heavily in favor of considering roads as structures. <br /> Exhibit B to Mr. Dolan's August 25 memorandum paints a bleak picture of the impact of <br /> building a connector to Sunset Creek: <br /> • Between 1.5 and 2.7 ants of grading (equivalent to the size of 1.4 to 2.6 football <br /> fields) <br /> • Movement of 812—1,234 truckdoadr of dirt <br /> • Construction of 187 —1,185 linear feet of retaining wall, at a height of between <br /> 8 and 12 foot tall <br /> • 12—21 heritage trees removed <br /> At Attachment 1, I have included some photos displaying the sort of grading occurring <br /> presently at another development, on slopes above the south side of Vineyard Avenue, off <br /> Pietronave Road and Silver Oak Ave (just past Western Garden Nursery). <br /> This is the exactly sort of thing the PP voters wanted to prevent happening to hillsides, but <br /> is the very sort of thing necessary to do when grading and building a road. <br /> Traffic <br /> There were numerous witnesses who offered anecdotal accounts regarding traffic along <br /> Junipero. I think it is safe to say that residents of all the involved neighborhoods think we <br /> presently have too much traffic. So to divorce out one's own subjective impressions, it is <br /> important to focus on the only neutral, comprehensive evidence we have regarding traffic <br /> along the various routes: the City's own analysis as reported in the EIR. <br /> • Those figures report quite plainly that the busiest street in Ventana is Junipero, with <br /> an existing average weekday traffic figure of 2,880 trips. You can see this graphically <br /> in Figure 4.6-2. In the Environmentally Superior Scenario (No. 1), Junipero is <br /> predicted to go to 3,140 trips. <br /> • The busiest street in Sycamore, on the other hand, has an existing average weekday <br /> traffic figure of 3,440 trips. So, even with the increase in traffic under <br /> Scenario 1, it is beyond debate that Junipero still will have fewer daily trips <br /> than Sycamore has now. Under Scenario 6, Sycamore will increase to 4,130 trips <br /> Per 4 <br /> The Traffic Engineer's comments at the Workshop were particularly helpful to understand <br /> the various arguments raised: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.