My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
120115
>
08 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:46:19 AM
Creation date
11/12/2015 11:12:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/1/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
08 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
NOTES
THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM 11-3-2015 MEETING
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br /> June 24, 2015 <br /> PUD-25 (Lund Ranch II) <br /> Brian Dolan <br /> Chairwoman Allen <br /> Planning Commissioners <br /> The approval of the Lund Ranch II access road (PUD-25) doesn't just warrant some <br /> consideration of Measure PP—it is all about Measure PP. Measure PP was a major <br /> change for Pleasanton, a hillside protection law enacted by its voters that would override <br /> some informal agreements and the existing General Plan. <br /> Measure PP states, "Housing units and structures shall not be placed on slopes of 25%or <br /> greater, or within 100 vertical feet of a ridgeline"; this statement includes houses and all <br /> other structures. The Pleasanton Municipal Code defines"structure" as"anything <br /> constructed or erected which requires a location on the ground..." (PMC 18.08.535), <br /> which definitely includes roads. The California Building Code#65927 states "`structure' <br /> includes, but is not limited to, any building, road, pipe, flume, conduit...". Roads built <br /> on 25% slopes could also require v-ditches and retaining walls, both of which are <br /> structures. <br /> In 2012, the Planning Commission (3/14/2012) and Council (11/27/2012), led by Staff's <br /> recommendation (11/27/2012), unanimously agreed that roads were structures. These <br /> opinions continued until the members of the Planning Commission and Council changed <br /> and the City Attorney opined that prior Specific Plans could not be grandfathered or <br /> exempted from Measure PP. <br /> Since roads are prohibited on slopes of 25% or greater,the connection from Lund Ranch <br /> to Sunset Creek Way cannot be built; only Option#1 in your staff report can be <br /> approved, with access through Lund Ranch Road only. Please remember, it is the <br /> opinion of the City Attorney that the documents compiled by the Ventana Hills Steering <br /> Committee are not legally binding or enforceable against the owners of Lund Ranch II. <br /> But Measure PP is binding on all development in Pleasanton. <br /> Measure PP was passed, overwhelmingly, by the voters of Pleasanton. The voters <br /> believed they were preserving the hillsides in their natural state. No one was thinking <br /> that grading could be allowed to construct roads. <br /> Your decision tonight will define hillside development in Pleasanton for decades to <br /> come. Please support your voters by upholding Measure PP and recommending to the <br /> Council Option#1, the environmentally preferred plan as proposed by the developer. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Greg O'Connor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.