Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 6. Normalized First Year KWh Savings Equivalent Costs for the 2015 PG&E <br /> Portfolio <br /> Normalized Unit Cost of First Year kWh Equivalent <br /> G 80,000,000,000 <br /> 0 <br /> o 70,000,000,000 — <br /> d <br /> U-, <br /> ° 60,000.000.000 <br /> 0�1 <br /> (.7 <br /> 50,000.000000 <br /> v <br /> 0.0 <br /> c <br /> m 40,000.000,000 <br /> Ui <br /> Y 30,000,000,000 <br /> } <br /> 20,000.000,000 <br /> W <br /> 8) <br /> 10.000,000,000 <br /> E <br /> I <br /> oe ti5 �^ 4' 4'` 4" 41' by �° 2% 4' �,4 e^ ^^ �� q4 4' �' °y tia 4A a^ d" <br /> 4° �P' 41 41 41 4) 4 �P' 4° 5°' 41 S° 5° 41 . 5° 4 4° 41 y0 4) 4) �P �v yY 5''• 4''- „.4.‘ <br /> ' �• <br /> Cost per First Year kWh <br /> —Cumulative kWh Equivalent <br /> Table 8. Select Unit Costs for Energy Efficiency(Si net kWh) <br /> Percent Program Cost Per First Year <br /> Program Savings that are Net kWh <br /> Admin Sub-Program Name Electric Equivalent <br /> PG&E Commercial Energy Advisor 18% $0.18 <br /> MCE MEA 02 -Small Commercial 79% $0.37 <br /> PG&E Lighting Programs Total 100% $0.38 <br /> ------------------------ <br /> MCE MEA01 2013-14 MF- Multifamily 36% $0.59 <br /> PG&E East Bay 93% $0.59 <br /> Third Party RightLights 100% $0.75 <br /> PG&E Energy Savers 100% $0.81 <br /> Third Party Energy Fitness Program 100% $0.84 <br /> Based on this analysis, a cost of$0.61 per net first year kWh was used to represent the current <br /> unit cost of energy efficiency. As discussed in the following section, this unit cost was <br /> subsequently multiplied by the available funding to determine how much EE will be achieved in <br /> Alameda County, based on the previous assumptions that both the technical and economic <br /> market potential exists. <br /> F-31 <br />