22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Remi Model Inputs Based on the proceeding discussions regarding the availability of energy efficiency in Alameda County, and the potential for funding and associated costs, the MRW team developed the inputs for the REMI model that reflects several overarching assumptions; • Technical, economic and market potential for energy efficiency is available in the County, including markets and technologies that are likely underrepresented in existing program offerings and offer the opportunity for new market interventions to achieve savings that are incremental to the goals currently established by the CPUC for PG&E. • Regulators have defined the funding mechanisms for CCA's to administer energy efficiency programs, and this analysis used a conservative approach to forecast funding for energy efficiency over the MRW analysis timeframe. additional funding may be developed from multiple other source that can be used to develop additional energy savings. Table 9 provides a summary of the factors used in the energy efficiency analysis used to develop inputs for the REMI Model, and Table 10 provides additional definitions intended to provide further transparency and clarity into the efficiency analysis. Table 9. Factors Used in the Energy Efficiency Analysis Analysis Factors Value First year available EE portfolio budget $3,350,453 Non-Union Labor Cost $67.26 Union Labor Cost $79.37 Average Labor Cost $73.32 Ratio of union hourly cot to non-union hourly costs 1.18 Incentives as%of total program costs 51.43% %of portfolio budget where program labor is union 20.22% Labor as a %of total measure cost 27.98% Incentives as%of total measure cost 21.43% Annual Energy Growth Rates (%)61 0.98% PGE kW/kWh ratio 0.0158% Average cost per EE program staff $100,000 Labor as a percent of program spending 70.00% Ave PG&E program cost per first year annual gross kWh $0.42 Portfolio NTG 0.7 ----------- Average PGC$/kWh $0.61 %of Program Budget- Incentives which are Direct Install Labor 65.65% Incentive %total program budget - Residential 33.05% Incentive %total program budget-Commercial 43.44% Incentive %total program budget- Industrial 15.51% Incentive %total program budget- Municipal 8.01% 61 California Energy Demand 2015 Revised-Mid Demand F-32