15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Kendall Rose If it goes to any type of hearing including Zoning Administrator, Staff Review Board, Planning Commission, or City Council, we notice a 1,000-foot radius If it's an administrative level project, such as an ADR, we only notice the adjacent properties Then we have 100, 300, and 600-foot radius projects such as outdoor dining, Christmas tree lots, large family daycares, and new wireless sites Commissioner Balch There comes my adjourned challenge to which is, what is your radius of notice even in the new process in light of your current processes for staff and zoning administrator process or others, right, I would advise given the 1,000 feet has been told to me for a while that we need a consistent and it doesn't need to be a consistent 1,000 feet but it's something that you're able to defend as your process Commissioner Nagler Can I ask a question? Can you give us an example of you point out that what you're really trying to cover are those items that currently come to the Planning Commission which are typically on Consent Can you just give us an example of an item if you have one that came to the Planning Commission that was not on Consent but you would include in this definition of a Minor Conditional Use Permit'? Do you know what I'm asking'? Weinstein So we're in the process of going back now and reviewing all of our CUPs that have gone to the Planning Commission over the last several years We've only gone back a couple of years at this point so I don't think we have a great list of the breakdown for different CUPs But what we're talking about here are uses like arts and crafts studios with more than 20 students on site at any given time These are often uses that are looking to locate in retail centers but there's already lots of activity Generally speaking, the times people are coming to these sorts of uses are metered, right? There's not a huge outpouring of people at 5 00 p m or in pouring at 8 00 a m so again, they're routine uses that generally don't have a lot of spillover impacts Commissioner Nagler No, that's fine Here's why I'm asking the question and to be thought about, is what you are proposing are minor things just like you suggested, but the issue is really what might be outliers What might be those things which would be included in the definition that is ultimately adopted for a minor CUP but which in fact is that two percent of the applications which ought to maybe have a public hearing Beaudin Can I just say from a procedural perspective, anything that comes in as a minor CUP can always you know, if it starts to generate a lot of neighborhood interest, if it starts to generate a lot of concern even at the staff level, it will be pushed to the Planning Commission and it will be still called a minor CUP but it will be reviewed here and ultimately everything is appealable as well So if we make a decision that's questioned by anyone, they come forward with the appeal and it comes to the Planning Commission as well, so there is a check in the process both on the front end and on the back end Chair Ritter I can think of two tennis courts Weinstein And from the Planning Commission, all I'm saying is either the Planning Commission or the City Council could pull items as well that would be listed on our report that would be published and included in your packet as well EXCERPT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 2 of 25