15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Brown What was the justification for the 10 days for minors given that it sounds like you're shortening something that could say take a month or two months'? You've shortened it down to 10 days, is that enough'? My concern is people go away for a week and it takes three days to get the mail, etc , etc So 10 days to me is a little short I mean you're drastically improving it for people You lower the cost of the fee which is great and you're going from months down to 10 days which seems a little short Was there a justification for the 10 days or is that up for discussion'? Bonn It's certainly up for discussion The thought process there is that it's sort of a middle point So we have some administrative processes that require a seven day noticing period so it's even shorter than the 10-day, and the other factor is the appeal period on the tail end and on the front end, the time it takes for staff to be able to send out the notices We typically have to work with applicants a little bit before we're prepared to send out the notice to surrounding neighbors so it's not necessarily day one I mean, if it's a great, clean, perfect application and it has everything we need then we can send the notices out on day one, but what happens more often than not is that there's something that needs to get clarified or we have to work through some topics of discussion and it's a little bit of time before that notice can go out So like I said, it's certainly up for discussion It was sort of maybe the middle ground The minor modification process that we have now is a 10 day noticing process Commissioner Brown Okay Commissioner Balch Could you repeat that? The zoning administrator actions are a 10 day process right now, right'? The intended notice period'? Bonn So for a PUD where's somebody is proposing to modify the PUD, we call it a PUD Minor Modification The notification for that is a 10 day noticing Commissioner Balch Sorry I misheard, but thank you Bonn So we've touched on a lot of the information that's on this slide already with the types of uses that would be subject to a minor CUP What I do want to bring your attention to is the first bullet point The draft of the zoning code update that you received includes a proposal to include non-retail, non-restaurant, first floor uses along Main Street to be subject to this new minor CUP process Staff has heard from the community and we have done some outreach efforts and at this time, we're proposing that to be actually tabled for discussion until the Downtown Specific Plan update is well underway, thinking it's more of a policy discussion and more appropriate for that forum rather than the zoning code update So that's why it's in grey on this slide because we are proposing to step back from that Commissioner Allen A question on that, are you moving to the next slide'? Bonn Yes Commissioner Allen Okay On the second item on students—would that apply to a tutoring facility that had an outdoor playground area'? And I'm thinking of the Raley's situation that we had where it was kind of a school and it was going to have a EXCERPT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 4 of 25