Laserfiche WebLink
to us, but it was a full blown hearing Was that because of community outreach or would <br /> that have qualified? <br /> Weinstein We just decided to do that particular one because it was a slightly more <br /> complex CUP than the permits that usually come through the planning division and also <br /> to give Jay some exposure to the Planning Commission <br /> Commissioner Balch Couldn't it have been a minor CUP? <br /> Weinstein So if my recollection is correct, that was a private club That was the use <br /> category and that's not part of our list of uses that are eligible for minor CUPs Under <br /> our current proposal it would not be eligible for a minor CUP <br /> Commissioner Balch Let me phrase it another way That club, if they would have come <br /> in and say they were a chamber orchestra music facility could they have been a minor <br /> CUP'? <br /> Weinstein Right, if they were just simply a music academy, but as part of the <br /> application review process we look at proposals and we ascertain what use the <br /> applicant <br /> Commissioner Balch Let me tell you what my concern is, right, so here's what's <br /> happened with that particular one Staff level approval of a minor PUD modification <br /> which modifies conditions set by this body to allow uses outside of a designated time <br /> block It was a condition of the PUD right? Then you move forward 25 or so years and <br /> so we do a staff level, Zoning Administrator approval to modify that condition and then <br /> come sometime you could do a minor CUP and have a chamber orchestra in an <br /> industrial area, a light industrial area, which may be considered an incompatible use but <br /> yet all approvals are at the staff level It is similar to the coding school Both could have <br /> been at staff level under this process Does that concern you? <br /> Beaudin Can I suggest I think we need to establish a better list of uses and a more <br /> concrete list of uses for the minor use permit process and here's just frankly what <br /> happened We looked into all of the CUPs over the last couple of years and we couldn't <br /> find any that fit really well into this category so far so we're going to cast a wider net and <br /> see which uses may not fit and ultimately, this minor use permit concept just might not <br /> have a use that fits there right now We committed to exploring this idea because what <br /> we hear a lot of times is that the CUP process is too onerous but it's hard to have a <br /> conversation with you tonight in a really meaningful way because we don't have a list of <br /> uses we'd like to put into that bucket and create that streamlined process for, and I think <br /> your question, Commissioner Balch, is valid except that we're not even sure that a use <br /> like that is going to end up in here I think we've got some uses we think could work but <br /> the 20 students is a lot depending on the size of a shopping center and I think if you <br /> think of a music school, maybe it's two rooms and they have up to five kids on site at <br /> any given time, maybe that's a different scenario than 20, and 20 might work at a site <br /> that has a 200,000 square foot office complex so even just putting the number of <br /> students in here gives me pause <br /> EXCERPT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 6 of 25 <br />