My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
011717
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
1/11/2017 11:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Balch Maybe I could suggest we go by retail and then we move to page <br /> 23 and go by personal? <br /> Chair Ritter We've got an hour to go through 4 questions and how do we do this most <br /> efficiently? That's what I'm asking So staff, what do you really need from us is I guess <br /> what we need to know <br /> Weinstein Commissioner Allen's comment was really helpful I think if you have <br /> problems with any of the categories, then let us know <br /> Beaudin This isn't your only opportunity We will be back, so if you're looking at this two <br /> days from now, send us an email and we'll keep iterating on this as we take it around <br /> and show it to other people as well and when we come back, we'll try to capture all the <br /> changes for you in a staff report <br /> Chair Ritter Just like Brad did with his email <br /> Commissioner Brown Before we move onto the 60,000, when I looked at Table 1, <br /> approximate square footage of retail venues and I looked at the size of Lucky's, Macy's, <br /> Safeway, both the Pleasanton Gateway and Amador Center and when I think about the <br /> Johnson Drive EDZ and the Measure MM or whatever it is coming up in the fall, that's <br /> set at 50,000 Would 50,000 not be a more appropriate number based on the examples <br /> in Table 1 versus 60,000? <br /> Weinstein One of the authors is sitting in this room right now, he'll admittedly say that <br /> you know, 50,000 square feet is a somewhat arbitrary breakoff in terms of regulating <br /> uses above that differently than regulating uses below it So again, we're open to <br /> different suggestions on the appropriate square footage for the breakoff, but in looking <br /> at uses here in town that exist right now, it seemed like uses above 60,000 square feet <br /> had slightly different use patterns than uses below that, but the breakdown could be <br /> anywhere really, it seemed like 60,000 was about the right number <br /> Chair Ritter So a question You came up with all of these Is there some city that we're <br /> mimicking that's done it really well that we're trying to figure out how it works best? <br /> Commissioner Balch No, that's why we're here <br /> Chair Ritter Okay, let's make it better than the other best city How did we start with <br /> this? That's what I'm <br /> Beaudin Maybe I'll just try and pull back to the definition of you know retail and larger <br /> footprint retail We've done a lot of work with Amy Herman Economics as part of the <br /> Johnson Drive work and she's been really helpful in terms of characterizing different <br /> scales of a different size of retail footprints and what that really means in terms of actual <br /> vendors I don't have her table with me tonight, but I would say that anything 80,000 and <br /> larger is large footprint retail That's a pretty common threshold and it's used both in <br /> planning terms and by economists to define "big box" and so I think what we said is the <br /> scale and character of Pleasanton is a little bit different and smaller than elsewhere, and <br /> EXCERPT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 13 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.