15 - Laserfiche WebLink

as you have wisely said It is not in this zoning because it's just not needed It's already got its PUD and it's already been here But as I think about it, it does make sense, and in fact when we define it internally in my company we do define it as light industrial because that is a pretty synonymous term with what it's at versus what one would consider heavy industrial Heavy industrial typically means you can do way more It has heavy power in the area Livermore has a very large, heavy industrial space near Greenville Road You attract a different clientele from that area than you do to a multi- tenant light industrial, kind of almost mixed use, bordering on mixed use between that and other uses I get that it might not be technically necessary yet, but we have that use It's just hiding under a PUD umbrella in my opinion at this point Commissioner Brown One thing to clarify, I mean, there was light industrial as a district I and the comment in the staff report is that there's nothing zoned in that district and therefore we should delete it Yet, when you go under definitions and you look at the table, light industrial is defined and it's within the table So I guess my question as well was Commissioner Nagler It's actually in the table and we're deleting the table Commissioner Balch It's on page 12 Commissioner Brown But it was defined on 18 080 15 Commissioner Balch It's defined, but if you look at the table Commissioner Brown No, the top of the table is crossed off, LI as a district, however, if you look on page 24 under Industrial, it is defined there so LI is deleted as a district but it's still defined as a category if you're using the right terms under Industrial Therefore, it showed up in the definitions on 18 080 015 and does that I have public comments about it, but I don't know if that satisfies Mr Hirst's concern or not Commissioner Balch But then the concern is that you might not like this medical office building right above it and it theoretically can't go in a light industrial area because it's permitted in this case obviously, but industrial G or an industrial park, right? Weinstein So what we're saying is that we think it's okay in the absence of any LI districts in town, we think it's okay to delete them from our zoning ordinance because light industrial uses are allowed in other districts, right'? We don't need that LI district anymore to accommodate light industrial uses because light industrial uses can be accommodated elsewhere, so that's the concept here If we think there's a need for LI districts, we'll need to rezone existing districts to that district so that would, in itself, require a rezoning, I just want to point that out Commissioner Brown I was confused at first, but I'm okay with what you did personally Commissioner Allen Me too Chair Ritter Okay, any other comments on the categories'? Commissioner Balch I do like it EXCERPT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 17 of 25