My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
011717
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
1/11/2017 11:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Allen Okay, so less than 20 today is permitted Is that what you're <br /> saying? <br /> Bonn Right <br /> Commissioner Allen because the underlining made me think it's a change <br /> Commissioner Balch It's all new The whole page is new <br /> Commissioner Allen Okay, so it's permitted in all the areas now <br /> Bonn That's correct The underlining you're seeing is because it's a brand new table <br /> and the organization is completely different <br /> Commissioner Allen Okay, thank you <br /> Seto And I would just note it's underlined in the zoning code, but there have been <br /> specific projects that you've seen within specific areas that the PUD or the zoning for <br /> that specific site did require educational places to have their own CUP So that's why <br /> you've seen a variety, practically speaking <br /> Commissioner Allen Okay, could I just bring up one example because I want to make <br /> sure I understand what I should be doing here or know if we're changing anything An <br /> example I'm thinking of, and you guys know the example, is Raley's where there was <br /> going to be a tutoring or care facility with an outdoor area and we ended up saying the <br /> outdoor area wasn't appropriate And I thought that was conditional So, that's why I'm <br /> asking and I'm wondering where that kind of facility would fit here and if there's anything <br /> we're changing in the way we think about that example <br /> Commissioner O'Connor That was more than 20, correct? <br /> Commissioner Balch But it's a PUD <br /> Commissioner O'Connor It's a tutoring facility <br /> Bonn If memory serves me correct, and I may be wrong here, the Raley's shopping <br /> center is zoned C-N, so it's a straight zone where this table would apply and the Minor <br /> CUP process would be applicable if more than 20 students were proposed However, <br /> the footnote number 5 applies here, meaning that if an outdoor play area was proposed <br /> and the ambient noise level increased by 4 decibels Ldn, then the use would be <br /> automatically subject to a CUP irrespective of the fact that the table identifies it as a <br /> Minor CUP <br /> Commissioner Allen Okay, and how would someone know before it's built that the <br /> ambient noise level would exceed 4 dBA or not, to know whether it would be a Minor <br /> CUP or CUP? <br /> EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 2 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.