My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
011717
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
1/11/2017 11:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bonn That would be subject to the professional study The noise consultant would be <br /> responsible for determining whether the parameters proposed on the playground would <br /> in fact result in that 4 dBA increase <br /> Commissioner Allen So, it's a model, they're estimating <br /> Chair Ritter Your Table 2, comment 3 says, "Noise ordinance is not within the scope of <br /> this update and may be modified in future updates " That sounds like we're already <br /> doing a little bit of that with this update, but what does that mean? <br /> Beaudin We've heard from a number of stakeholders involved that are doing <br /> development in the community that the noise ordinance is out of date from their <br /> perspective We actually don't have much of an issue for a number of applications <br /> including the Masonic Lodge We've looked at what our neighbors are doing relative to <br /> noise ordinances We at the staff level aren't as concerned about it, but we know that it <br /> is a concern for some other folks who are commenting on our zoning code So we've <br /> added it to a future phase of our code update and we expect to get into it whole- <br /> heartedly It won't be use-by-use considering a 4 decibel change or something like that <br /> associated with one use, but rather we'll actually look at how we regulate noise <br /> Whether it's at the property line, or how we measure ambient noise, a one-event spike <br /> versus a period of time, all those things would be up for grabs <br /> Chair Ritter It'd be a bigger project <br /> Beaudin it'd be a much bigger endeavor <br /> Chair Ritter Okay, I understand <br /> Commissioner Balch I apologize Could I just ask a follow-up to Commissioner Allen's <br /> question which was about the schools, the private school versus the schools and <br /> colleges? With the example of the Raley's, that was a heritage school was it not? So <br /> that's going to fall under this 9 Maybe you could help us understand that'? <br /> Beaudin People refer to it as Little Ivy'? <br /> Commissioner Balch I think so <br /> Beaudin I don't know all of the details of that application but I know that it's more than <br /> 20 students I don't know the kind of school and I don't think that we split the hair in the <br /> code the last time That might have been how they identified themselves, but we didn't <br /> have the ability to define a heritage school and so we do now and we make that <br /> distinction just because they typically don't require the same kind of outdoor spaces <br /> because of the kind of programming that they offer <br /> Commissioner Balch I think I missed it so I apologize Let me ask it in a different way <br /> So, what would you call a private school versus school and college'? Because we do <br /> have that now added in, right'? The second and third are "private schools with no more <br /> than 20, private schools with more than 20, both with footnote 5 applicable " I'm on page <br /> 22 of the table <br /> EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 3 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.