Laserfiche WebLink
There's a 10-day notice period on a PUD Mod, then the actual decision on a PUD Mod, <br /> followed by a 20-day appeal period So if we're not processing concurrently, you're <br /> basically saying to someone that they take about 30 days or a month to process the <br /> PUD Mod and then they would start into the Minor CUP process <br /> With Commissioner Balch's suggestion, there'd be two administrative decisions rather <br /> than one administrative decision that would allow this new use, which would essentially <br /> allow the Planning Commission and the Council and anyone from the community to <br /> appeal at either stage Once stage one is done and the appeal period is over, they <br /> would have one more bite of the apple But its two bites of the apple instead of one, and <br /> you're talking about a two- to two-and-a-half-month process rather than a one-month <br /> process <br /> Commissioner O'Connor If they were done concurrently, would the notification be clear <br /> there were two minor changes—one at the PUD level and one at the CUP level'? <br /> Beaudin They would be And what we typically do is condition the CUP approval on <br /> the appeal period passing for the PUD Mod so you can't get your CUP unless the PUD <br /> Mod passed and it became effective <br /> Commissioner O'Connor To clarify, both would be noticed and people would have time <br /> to raise an issue'? <br /> Beaudin Yes, it's really whether it takes one month or two or more for that to happen <br /> Commissioner Balch If I may, Commissioner O'Connor, we actually debated this quite <br /> extensively because I didn't know if I had enough support up here on it or not I do just <br /> want to mention that it's only for new so the items listed in the proposal by staff now <br /> list out the things that are Minor CUP now that they're proposing to add All I'm trying to <br /> do in my desire and of course in my vote is to say that any new entitlements that come <br /> on board to this new Minor CUP process, those go through this 30 day wait Does that <br /> make sense'? Because they weren't there originally That's what I'm trying to do, and as <br /> we heard, it's not necessarily a full 30 days but it's some time <br /> Chair Ritter To keep it transparent <br /> Commissioner Balch Well, it's a double notice and that was what I think we talked <br /> about with staff You've got one notice for the Minor PUD and then you've got a second <br /> notice that goes out for the Minor CUP My hope would be that, you know, many people <br /> talk about not being noticed when something significant comes in and then they see the <br /> building going up and the business moving in and they're like, how did this get into my <br /> neighborhood'? My hope would be that this would be a very transparent process <br /> because that is a use that was not there initially And I do concede—it's a very low <br /> volume we're talking about here We're really talking about a very minute number of <br /> applications <br /> Commissioner O'Connor I'm not understanding why we need two notifications rather <br /> than one If you get notified, you're going to know that this change went through You <br /> EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 7 of 30 <br />