15 - Laserfiche WebLink

have a timeframe to respond Why do you need to get two and one month apart from each other'? I'm just trying to figure out why the citizen needs to get two notices Commissioner Balch And my answer is because it didn't come to the Planning Commission It didn't come to the oversight board or body of the staff Commissioner O'Connor But it does come to you You're notified Commissioner Balch We're not notified in the same way We're notified via the email from staff typically on the last day of the appeal period and you have to object Commissioner O'Connor Well, that only happens once in a while Usually we get them in advance Commissioner Balch That's where I stand on it I think it needs to be transparent because I don't think a double layer staff approval is appropriate Commissioner O'Connor See, I don't think that's the intent of streamlining this process I think the intent is to benefit the applicant—and again, these are supposed to be routine in nature Commissioner Balch But these aren't routine Commissioner O'Connor I'm saying if it's a Minor PUD change, it's supposed to be more routine If it's a Minor CUP, it always goes on a Consent Calendar and we don't even think twice about it most times We're just saying these are not big changes that hit you and all of a sudden where you ask how did that happen'? Most people don't even know that some of these things because they do slide through pretty much under the wire even on our Consent Calendar Commissioner Balch So two examples we have is the Gateway Shopping Center which is the Safeway down on Bernal They did a Minor PUD Modification and they did a concurrent Minor CUP Modification The CUP came up and they put in a coding education school in the retail center That was a Minor PUD Modification to add the use The use went in as a conditional use It probably didn't need to be at the level of conditional but it was That's where they possibly would have put it in as a Minor CUP instead of an approved conditional with the PUD, and then it did come before us as a Consent item So from my perspective, the fact that it comes up to this body as a Consent item is something I support Or, but what I'm saying if you're going through a two-step process to get there, you first have to modify your PUD and then you have to go through a Minor CUP I want a breath personally I don't want the pacing of it to go so fast that it's at a staff level approval for something that was never there on the PUD Commissioner O'Connor So why did you make the Minor PUD change'? So that they could get the Minor CUP item to go through, right'? It really is, for lack of a better description, it is a one-step, right'? They're only asking for the Minor PUD change in order to get the use EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 8 of 30