15 - Laserfiche WebLink

before the Planning Commission Minor CUPs don't come to the Planning Commission So my point is that while we're noticed through a process and that works, I haven't seen us ever contest one and I think part of our job is slight oversight and I just feel like we'd be giving up too much of it Commissioner O'Connor It makes a lot of sense when you talk about the example of Hacienda Business Park getting their first Minor PUD, but you've got to remember, almost everything we do is a PUD So almost any change outside of the business park and every PUD change that needs a Minor CUP change is going to have to go through a two-step process There's very few—it's not going to be where we're going to have multiples coming through the Hacienda Business Park, so you can only have a stall on one for the business park It's like every other project is its own Commissioner Balch Not necessarily because if we do a Minor PUD for example to add a use and the use is straight up, it's going to go in as permitted This doesn't apply This is only if the use goes in as a slightly more than permitted and slightly less than conditional It only has two choices right now When you modify your PUD you can only go in as conditional or as permitted If they go in as conditional, there's a three-month wait under the current system All I'm saying is that if they choose this middle ground where it needed to be a little bit more than permitted and a little bit less than conditional, that would mean you know what I'm saying, that's where I'm at on that one Chair Ritter Do we need to get a resolution on that point before we move on? Beaudin A straw vote would be great just so we can keep a tally as we go Chair Ritter Can you please summarize what Commissioner Balch said Beaudin I believe what Commissioner Balch is looking for is non-concurrent processing of Minor PUD Modifications and Minor CUPs when they're being added to an existing PUD I understand it as a two-step process where somebody would submit an application for a Minor PUD Mod, we would take that through the administrative process, including the notice period, the decision, and the appeal period, and then we would do the same for a Minor CUP which would start after the appeal period for the PUD Mod Commissioner Balch But only if the Minor PUD had made it a Minor CUP element Beaudin Right, a new Minor CUP use Commissioner Balch Correct Chair Ritter I support it Commissioner Allen I support it Commissioner Nagler I think it's completely reasonable and appropriate Chair Ritter It puts a level of protection on the process EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 10 of 30