15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Balch But what if the second applicant comes through because PUD's are not only a building, a PUD can be an entire park The entire park puts in their PUD that you can now have heritage schools, for example, as a Minor CUP process, right'? So the first applicant goes in and his intent is exactly what you're saying His intent is to get through the Minor CUP process so that he gets into the park Now the second applicant comes in and they don't have to go through the Minor CUP process, and have no problem with that because the Minor PUD process went through its process and now they're going to come through and do a Minor CUP process at an administrative level So in that case, time has passed that the Minor PUD has gone in, the second applicant comes in and they only have to do a Minor CUP, right'? Because now the business park, for example, has the Minor PUD Commissioner O'Connor So only the first applicant to do this is penalized by two months and everyone who follows Commissioner Balch because the use was never there in the first place, that's right Chair Ritter It's a brand new use Commissioner Balch It's a brand new use added to a business park Beaudin The list of Minor CUP items is pretty limited as it's been proposed in this update I've talked to some of you about the fact that we're dipping our toe in the water and this isn't an effort to go all in on a streamlined review process I'll put out there the idea of if this list is going to grow then it's possible to revisit the process that we go through associated with Minor PUD Mods or the review and approval of CUPs I don't know if that helps the conversation this evening, but the list of Minor Conditional Uses is smaller now than it probably will be 10 years from now I would hope, and so there will be other shots at what this section of the code looks like Commissioner Balch And that's where my argument is, that as the list grows—let's just say we have 10 uses that are following the Minor CUP process now, to get to 20, each time one gets added under this theory, if the applicant was trying to get that through a Minor PUD first, that just takes the breath, and it's 20 days—we're talking 20 days And the second applicant has no breath The same business park—the same PUD is already applied to the park as a whole, so the second and further applicants have no delay I don't think it's that much of a hindrance on a business to wait 20 days when the use was never allowed under the PUD in the first place If they want to accelerate it, in my opinion, they are welcome to come before this body and pay a little more to get here But I think we talked about that being a three- to four-month process, so we still are shortening our window if I'm understanding correctly Beaudin Relative to a CUP the Minor CUP is going to be a faster process Processing Minor CUP and Minor PUD concurrently would be the fastest process, Minor CUP and Minor PUD non-concurrently and second fastest, and CUP would be slowest Commissioner Balch And my other point is that as things are added to the Minor CUP process through the standard zoning updates, this doesn't apply because it's only when the PUD had to be modified through a minor process because Minor PUDs don't come EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 9 of 30