15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Beaudin I think there's two criteria there—the minor conditional uses are supposed to be uses more routine in nature and things that we have pretty standard conditions for that we can apply, and so they should be less impactful on the community Things that require a CUP shouldn't ever elevate into neighborhood issues By definition, they're minor in nature And then the notice criteria, the idea here again is that these are things that are going to fit into the existing context that they're being proposed in Chair Ritter My thinking is that the first time it goes through its going to be a little more challenging, but we're going to make sure that we've vetted all the options That's why you want it to be checked, but the second, third, fourth, fifth-anybody who submits after, those will go through way more efficiently Commissioner Balch Yes because they don't have the 10 and the 20 days because the PUD allowed the use Chair Ritter So the original one is the double check Commissioner Balch Yes, because it's putting a use in an area that has not been there That's why it needs the two-steps in my opinion Commissioner Brown Can I clarify one thing with Gerry? The Minor PUD noticing radius is 1,000 feet—is it 1,000 feet of the PUD or 1,000 feet of the business that would be going in? Beaudin It's the properties that are encompassed by the PUD The Minor PUD process is 1,000 feet The Minor CUP is proposed at 300 feet, so the scope gets smaller based on the use Commissioner Brown So it's 1,000 feet of the PUD whereas the other one would be 300 feet around the proposed unit within the PUD Is that correct? Bonn There have been occasions where we do Minor PUD Modifications for a specific site and in that instance we've done a 1,000-foot noticing radius around that particular property where that modifies only to that one particular site even though it's a PUD Where it applies to the entire PUD we would do a 1,000-foot radius around the PUD Commissioner Brown Right I guess my point was if the site notification is 1,000 feet around the PUD, do you really need to go through a second cycle of noticing 300 feet around the target unit? So, again, I'm just reiterating what Greg's point is, but I think we should probably move on Beaudin I'm seeing a 4-2 straw vote, so we'll move on Commissioner Balch My next question is in the staff report on page 9, and it is just more of a question for semantics It talks about how the Zoning Administrator under the Minor CUP process can request studies to be performed so that they can have an informed decision in the Minor CUP process It says here, "Request traffic, noise, other EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 12 of 30