15 - Laserfiche WebLink

technical studies " I just wanted to ask maybe how staff envisions this At what point does it kick up to Planning Commission versus a staff level Minor CUP if we start to order all these reports? Beaudin I think reports can just be confirmation in some instances I think if something gets to be questionable or potentially controversial, I would imagine that would show up here at the Planning Commission and you would be making the decision on the Minor CUP And that's how we handle things now when uses are under administrative review and we get information through the application process, make some decisions and decide to either elevate those things or make a final decision, and it's going to be subjective based on the application and context Commissioner Balch And I apologize because that's actually leading into my next comment or question which is, what would you do for a notice period or notice radius when it's coming here to make that decision, because 300 feet is not necessarily a standard for the Planning Commission, correct' Beaudin It's a good question It would still be the Planning Commission making a decision on a Minor CUP and the way we proposed it currently is still a 300-foot radius Commissioner O'Connor I would have expected that if it was still a Minor CUP that the Zoning Administrator would make the decision, but if based on the information you have from these reports, if it was a little more challenging than that, it would be a regular CUP, right? Beaudin It's a name only at that point It would essentially still be a CUP that would run with the land and how we've defined it in the use table is how it would live through our process We wouldn't adjust the use category it's in based on those details Commissioner Brown I suppose it could be minor but it's setting a precedent and you want to run it through as well Beaudin Correct, and frankly I would imagine some of these uses initially, and I think I've said this before to this group, the idea that we're going to get all this perfect the first time out is not there for me I've seen it and lived it We're going to make a lot of changes to the code and we're going to see some things that just don't work, and maybe we get our first couple of Minor CUP applications in one of these categories we've proposed and we just say it's not working and we say we'll be back to correct it with you Commissioner Balch So I just want to make sure Beaudin Shweta is telling me that we have an internal policy, but I would want to modify it if it does come to the Planning Commission We should say that it's 1,000 feet, and if that's the will of the Commission, I'd be supportive of that It sounds like we're doing that but it's a policy decision and not in the code I think it just makes sense for things like that to say it clearly EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 13 of 30