My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
011717
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
1/11/2017 11:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Balch My only comment to this was just that the traffic at the Amador <br /> Safeway and the Pleasanton Gateway Safeway is fun and so I wanted to qualify, and <br /> obviously you look at this and I don't know necessarily that 2,000 square feet makes a <br /> major traffic impact, but it sure seems like it's awfully darn close <br /> Commissioner Allen The concern I have with 60,000 square feet is specific to the C-C <br /> District, and I know it's unlikely but at our last meeting we talked about potentially <br /> having three types of sizing Theoretically, let's say that the Vic's Shopping Center <br /> area—I don't know how many square feet—or some of the new redevelopment we're <br /> doing downtown frees up a lot of space, and Safeway wants to come in The thing I'm <br /> concerned about is if we actually have City code that says someone could come in up to <br /> 60,000 feet without a CUP, just straight permitted in C-C, I'm concerned about that <br /> because we have such limited downtown space and I think we want to be very strategic <br /> about keeping it pedestrian-scaled and small-scaled, and we know we have a huge <br /> traffic challenge downtown Adding a Safeway or Raley's somewhere downtown if <br /> something freed up could be a nightmare So I'm concerned with having that allowed in <br /> the C-C District <br /> Commissioner O'Connor It's downtown but it's separate though, right'? <br /> Commissioner Allen C-C is downtown Can you show me on the table'? Maybe I'm <br /> misreading this <br /> Commissioner Balch Page 30 <br /> Commissioner Brown I think they mention this in Table 2 of Exhibit B, Item no 8 as <br /> well <br /> Commissioner Allen Okay, because I'm looking at page 30 and on page 30 for up to <br /> 60,000 feet for C-C it says it's permitted, which would say if Safeway came to us, it <br /> would say it's permitted <br /> Bonn Your read of what it says is correct A C-C zoned property less than 60,000 <br /> square feet would be a permitted use So to address your comment specifically related <br /> to downtown there's probably limited spaces that are 60,000 or more square feet If <br /> somebody were to demolish an existing shopping center and start brand new, that <br /> would also require design review and something like a brand new building downtown <br /> would come to the Planning Commission <br /> Commissioner Allen So today it comes to us and what we do is we say, was it <br /> permitted or not'? We'd look here and say, oh yeah, it's permitted So then it makes it <br /> more difficult for us to say, no you can't be here You know, I mean it begs the <br /> question Today, we don't have any limit, right'? Correct'? <br /> Bonn Correct, there's no square footage threshold <br /> Commissioner Allen So therefore if Safeway came in, we're sort of given all kinds of <br /> flexibility <br /> EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 15 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.