15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Balch I was going to ask but I didn't want to be so specific, because under our Minor PUD Mod, if it kicks up to Planning Commission, you re-notice and re- distribute the card for this meeting with 1,000 feet as I recall Beaudin What Shweta is saying is we've been doing that It's the same thing with our 1,000-foot notice We did that by policy and not by law or by code Commissioner Balch Okay, so to make sure I understand—with a Minor CUP we do 300 feet If it got kicked up because of difficulty or wanting to have it reviewed here, you would notice it for this meeting and increase the notice radius to 1,000 feet Beaudin Yes, and I would say that we'll make a change to the code so the language here says that clearly Commissioner Nagler It's different than what's here but it's a good idea Beaudin Yes Commissioner Balch And then my last question is more just a question on the uses in the Table on page 29 I just noticed that the places of assembly of 100 or fewer attendees at one time is this Minor CUP process Can you give us your thoughts on what you're asking for here or what you're saying'? I know where it's at It's C-C and Office and Industrial and Park, right, so it's not necessarily that uncalled for per se Bonn The Community Facilities category is new It's really a consolidation and includes places of worship, and so in evaluating what uses would be applicable to the Minor CUP process, one that frequently comes to the Planning Commission on the Consent Calendar are places of worship 100 isn't a magic number but it seemed it could act as a reasonable threshold between what is a Minor CUP versus a CUP, that's essentially the gist of where that comes from Commissioner Balch I just wanted to mention that this is on my Minor PUD Mod, we added this in as a Minor PUD use So this is now something that would be one of these examples the Minor PUD is in the past by quite a lot of time but now this Minor CUP process is in, so this will be a double administrative approval separated by years in this case Okay, thank you Shweta I think I just have one more question Well, I think you guys handled it, but it was the 60,000 feet for the retail I looked at the chart in the staff report, it begs itself for 58,000 feet just by the nature of the ones listed, so I just didn't know if you guys wanted to clarify or add any further color to that, as to why 60,000 is the magic number'? Bonn There's definitely no magic to it We're certainly open to suggestions 60,000 seemed to be on the higher end, you know, where Raley's is These are not perfect, precise numbers Also, you'll notice that they're fairly round so it seemed to be on the higher end of the threshold just to accommodate as many uses below that, but also recognizing that that seems to be the upper limit for the types of neighborhood style uses that you would see without having to trigger an additional review process But again, we're certainly open to other thoughts on the 60,000 number EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 14 of 30