15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Beaudin Yes, it does and that will be the threshold—anything 7,500 square feet and larger will require a CUP Commissioner Balch And then as you probably will prepare for Council and ask them to weigh in on that number Is everyone comfortable with the 60,000 for the rest'? Or not'? Commissioner Nagler What are you suggesting'? Commissioner Balch I'm just looking at Table 1 on page 5 I'm saying the two Safeway complexes at approximately 50,000 square feet each generate a lot of traffic, right'? But at the same time, those are done so those are permitted now by nature of their PUDs, right'? It's a slightly moot point, but Commissioner O'Connor Raley's is 60,000 If you eliminate that, if we wanted another large grocery store someplace else in town, they won't come if the threshold is too small Commissioner Balch And again, it's only between permitted and conditional Commissioner Brown I would agree with Commissioner Balch I would think 55,000 square feet is probably better based on the table that I see Commissioner Nagler I would support 55,000 Commissioner Allen I would support 55,000 too Chair Ritter Okay Commissioner Allen So I'm on page 19, the very beginning which defines the special purpose in C-C (Central Commercial) District I'm not doing this just to wordsmith because otherwise we'd waste our time, but we look at these documents to determine our priority So, I'm not getting what the purpose of the C-C District is from here and it doesn't seem to be quite in sync with the DSP In other words, when I think of the C-C district, I think of a business district It's not solely business but it's a predominantly, as the DSP says "Retail use is considered highly desirable because it promotes pedestrian activity and interest, supports and complements other downtown businesses, and draws people into the downtown " So I would expect to be seeing the purpose A be something like that, it's important—it's the center of our small town commercial downtown activity Point B can be something related to, "and it also is residential and historic and multi-use is promoted " But I just felt like this whole emphasis on commercial got lost here in both the name change of this district and the way this is worded Shweta, you and I talked about a mixed use The term "mixed use" is being added here and I am 100% supportive of the way it's used on page 20 On the last paragraph of page 20, there is Point B, which says, "Multi-family dwellings and mixed use development shall be permitted in the C-C district " And Gerry and Shweta, this is what you and I talked about a couple of days ago I'm fully supportive of that What I worry EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 19 of 30