My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
011717
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
1/11/2017 11:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Beaudin I'm going to stick my neck out on a limb because I've been looking at a lot of <br /> the downtown maps lately and I think that it goes from essentially the bridge to Bernal <br /> and Peters over to First, and I don't know where it bends but it stays pretty close to <br /> Main Street I don't think it stays on First all the way up to Stanley <br /> Commissioner Nagler And in your recollection of having looked at all of these maps <br /> recently, what is the delta between Central Business district and Downtown <br /> Revitalization district'? <br /> Commissioner Balch Well, they eliminate Central Business <br /> Beaudin It was trying to get the language to line up between the zoning and the <br /> Specific Plan <br /> Commissioner Balch I think one of the things Nancy has caught onto is if I add the <br /> Downtown Revitalization District specifically to the C-C here, the C-C applies <br /> elsewhere, right? So, we're calling out the one area by your changes here that really <br /> hone in the downtown and kind of ignore the step child in the room I could go with no <br /> changes and let them handle it in the specific plan <br /> Commissioner Nagler Me too <br /> Chair Ritter I agree <br /> Commissioner Nagler Me too That's the most neutral thing we can do <br /> Commissioner Allen Agreed <br /> Commissioner Nagler I'm getting your point here about wanting to include mixed use in <br /> form, but let's just leave it the way it is <br /> Commissioner Brown I was just going to say you could add a reference that's back to <br /> the Specific Plan and say, "and support C, objectives as stated in the Downtown <br /> Specific Plan " <br /> Commissioner Nagler Too complicated, too many words, so let's just leave it the way it <br /> is <br /> Commissioner O'Connor In paragraph B are they talking about retail only on the <br /> ground floor? I know that came up years ago They're not inferring anything in there <br /> about the continuity '9 <br /> Beaudin I wasn't around for the intent discussion on this, but that's not how we use it <br /> and it's not how any of the regulations are written in that section of the code <br /> Commissioner O'Connor Well, it just reads as continuity of commercial frontage So <br /> you know, it's like trying to <br /> Beaudin I like it, but that's not how we interpret it <br /> EXCERPT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 23 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.